ENDTIME
ISSUES NEWSLETTER No. 182
ÒThe
Immortality of the SoulÓ
Samuele Bacchiocchi
Retired Professor of Theology, Andrews
University
Chapter 2 of the forthcoming book
POPULAR BELIEFS: ARE THEY BIBLICAL?
INDEX
OF TOPICS OF THIS NEWSLETTER
* How
to Subscribe and Unsubscribe
* New
Outreach Book: Popular Beliefs:
Are
they Biblical?
* A Plea for Help to Edit the
Manuscript
* A Report of the Friends of the Sabbath
Conference
* A New DVD Album: Abundant Life
Seminar
* Books
from Two Private Libraries for Sale
ÒThe Immortality of
the SoulÓ
(The
Essay of this Newsletter)
ANNOUNCEMENT
OF SERVICES & PRODUCTS
* How
to Contact the Center for Cancer Care
in
Goshen, Indiana that has healed my liver cancer.
*
Special offer on the Package of 10 DVD/CD albums,
containing
all the recordings of Prof. Jon Paulien,
Prof,
Graeme Bradford, and Prof. Bacchiocchi.
The
package includes also the newly released DVD
Abundant
Life Seminar.
*
Introductory offer on Prof. Jon PaulienÕs DVD album
on Simply
Revelation
*
Special offer on the new edition of Prof.
Bradford
More than a Prophet, together with a free DVD album.
*
Upcoming seminars for August, and September
*
Incredible Offer on the new Hitachi 3000 Lumens Projector
Only $1395.00
*
The Smallest and most Powerful Remote Presenter
*
Does your church or School Need a Screen?
*
Bed and Breakfast in London, England
*
TAGNET new Web-hosting offer
HOW
TO SUBSCRIBE AND UNSUBSCRIBE
To subscribe or unsubscribe to this newsletter,
please email your request to <[email protected]> To avoid past problems, we will add or remove your address
manually.
NEW
OUTREACH BOOK:
POPULAR
BELIEFS: ARE THEY BIBLICAL?
GOOD
NEWS! The newsletter you are about to read contains the first draft of chapter
2 of the forthcoming new book POPULAR BELIEFS: ARE THEY BIBLICAL? This is a pivotal chapter that examines what is perhaps the
most popular unbiblical belief of our time: The Immortality of the Soul.
Over
a century ago Ellen White predicted that ÒThrough the two great errors, the
immortality of the soul and Sunday sacredness, Satan will bring the people
under his deceptionsÓ (Great
Controversy, p. 588).
Both of these errors are spreading like wildfire today. The vast majority of
people have come to believe SatanÕs lie that no matter what they do, they
Òshall not dieÓ (Gen 3:4) but become like gods by living for ever.
This
lie has fostered a host of heresies such as spiritualism, communication with
the spirits of the dead, praying for the dead, the intercession of the saints,
purgatory, eternal hellfire, the worship of Mary, indulgences, etc. All of
these heretical beliefs fall automatically like dominos when we expose the
fallacies of conscious life between death and resurrection.
In
view of its importance, I have devoted much time and efforts in writing this
chapter. My goal has been
threefold:
1) To
offer the readers a historical glimpse of the origin and development of the
popular belief in the immortality of the soul.
2) To
provide a brief but compelling presentation of the Old and New Testaments view
of human nature in general and of the soul in particular.
3) To
help truth-seekers understand the negative impact of the belief in the
immortality of the soul on Christian doctrines and practices.
To
achieve these three objectives, I discuss several relevant topics, which are
examined at much greater length in my book Immortality or Resurrection? My challenge has been how to reduce to
30 pages the 300 pages treatment of the subject in my book, and still do
justice to the subject.
If
you feel that the chapter is too long for your reading habits, please do not
give up. By the time you reach the end of the chapter, you will be grateful for
the new insights you have gained.
The ultimate goat of the book is not
merely to expose the flaws of some popular beliefs, but to help people
appreciate the biblical validity and timeliness of our Adventist beliefs. You will see a sample of this goal in
this chapter. After exposing historically and biblically the deceptive popular
belief in the immortality of the soul, I proceed to help people appreciate the beauty of the biblical wholistic
view of human nature, as espoused by our Adventist church.
To my
knowledge our Adventist church has never published a substantive book that
helps people to understand why some of their popular beliefs are unbiblical,
and why the corresponding Adventist beliefs are biblically sound. Many
subscribers has confirmed my conviction that such a book is urgently needed for
our witnessing outreach. We can hardly expect people to accept our Adventist
beliefs, if we do not show them first of all why their beliefs are unbiblical.
The
book Seventh-day Adventist Believe . . . was warmly received by our church at large. I was invited to
contribute to a chapter. The book makes a significant contribution to the
presentation of our Adventist beliefs, but it is too limited in scope. It
simply presents the Adventist beliefs, without comparing or contrasting them
with the beliefs of other churches. Uninformed readers may feel that Adventists
beliefs are not much different from their own beliefs.
The
new book Popular Beliefs: Are they Biblical? will leave no room for this uncertainty.
It will clearly show the difference between the Adventists beliefs and some
popular Catholic and Protestant beliefs. In other words, it will give to people
a choice between biblical and unbiblical beliefs. You will see a clear example
in this chapter on ÒThe Immortality of the SoulÓ that you are about to read.
The
sponsors of this project are hoping to raise sufficient money cover most of the
expenses for printing 100,000 copies of Popular Beliefs: Are they
Biblical? The idea is to offer the book to churches
at a minimum cost of only $2.00 or 3.00 a copy, primarily to cover the mailing
expenses. The regular price for this 320 pages book would be $25.00.
What
do you think of this project? Do you feel that we badly need such a book for
our witnessing outreach? Are you
willing to pass out this book to your friends? Would you consider contributing
financially to the realization of this project? Your input is greatly
appreciated. Let me know what you
think.
In
order to complete this project by the end of February 2008, I need to
re-prioritize my schedule. This will entail cutting down on
speaking-engagements, posting the Endtime Issues Newsletters only once a month, and spending less
time answering messages and speaking on the phone.
To
benefit from the constructive criticism of our subscribers, I plan to post most
of the chapters as soon as the first draft is completed. An example, is this
chapter which examines the major false views of the nature of the Bible. I look forward to receive your
constructive criticism. Do not hesitate to be frank. Rest assured that I will
not be offended.
A
PLEA FOR HELP TO EDIT THE MANUSCRIPT
If you have been gifted with literary
skills, would you be willing to help me to clean up the first draft of each
chapter? To facilitate the editing process, I plan to email as an attachment a
MW file of each chapter, after I have made some of the changes recommended by
readers. For example, several readers of chapter 1, posted in the last
newsletter, have suggested that I remove the references to Ellen WhiteÕs
understanding of the inspiration of the Bible, because they may turn off
non-Adventists.
I
will follow the advice, but I wish to explain that my reasoning for presenting
Ellen WhiteÕs balanced view of inspiration, was to challenge people, especially
some of her critics, to appreciate her unique theological contribution to the
understanding of inspiration.
Specifically
I am looking for people who can help me in two ways:
(1) To eliminate spelling mistakes and
restructure sentences so that they sound more English than Italian.
(2) To
shorten sentences or paragraphs without weakening too much the strength of
the chapter. If you have time
and competence to help me in this project, I would be glad to email you each
chapter on a MW file, after I have made the major corrections recommended. Feel free to contact me at <[email protected]>
The
initial response has been very encouraging. Several people, including retired professors whom I have
known for a long time, have offered their service to clean up the manuscript.
Words fail to express my heartfelt gratitude to those willing to devote their
time and literary skills to this project.
Remember me in your prayers on this
project as you did for my healing from cancer. I believe that the Lord have
restored me to greater health and strength than I had before, because He wants
me to accomplish greater things for Him in this Endtime. Pray that the Lord may give me the
wisdom to expose errors and present the truth in a clear and loving way.
A
REPORT OF THE FRIENDS OF THE SABBATH CONFERENCE
On
September 7 and 8, 2007, a FRIENDS OF THE SABBATH conference was held at the Lecture Hall of the Knoxville
Convention Center in Tennessee. It is an impressive modern lecture hall that
seats 500 persons. The conference was sponsored by the Seventh Day Christian
Assembly in Knoxville,
and was attended by sabbatarians belonging to different religious organization.
A significant number of Seventh-day Adventist attended the Conference.
I
have spoken at similar FRIENDS OF THE SABBATH conferences in the USA and overseas, but I can honestly say
that this time the reception and response in Knoxville was unusual. On the Sabbath the people spent practically
the whole days from 10:00 a. m. to 9:00 p. m. in the Lecture Hall.
In
Sabbath afternoon there was a two hours panel discussion by six pastors of
different sabbatarian congregations. They addressed some of the issues
Sabbatarians face today. The discussion was chaired by Prof. Bruce Horne, Ph.
D., who teaches ÒCorporate English,Ó to leaders of corporations. He did an
excellent job in posing relevant questions to the panel members. He and his
wife are a lovely non-SDA professional couple who were primarily responsible
for organizing the conference.
The
panel discussion was followed by my last lecture ÒThe Sabbath Under Crossfire,Ó
where I deal with the latest Sabbath/Sunday developments. I was overwhelmed by the many
expressions of gratitude. Many told me that they captured a new vision on how
to make the Sabbath a day of joyful celebration of GodÕs creative and
redemptive love.
I have already received invitations from
SDA and non-SDA churches to go back to present another powerpoint seminar. I look forward to share my ministry
again with these fellow believers and friends. For me it is always a blessed experience to fellowship with
sabbatarians Christians who share the same commitment to the Savior by honoring
Him on His Holy Day.
NEWLY
RELEASED DVD ALBUM CALLED
ABUNDANT
LIFE SEMINAR
At the request of the World's Woman's
Christian Temperance Union, a special video taping was professionally done at Andrews
University last August 8, 2007, of my powerpoint lecture on The Christian and Alcoholic
Beverages. The lecture summarizes the highlights of
my book Wine in the Bible. With the help of 125 powerpoint slides, I share the findings of my
research which shows that the Bible clearly teaches total abstinence, and not
moderation.
This
lecture will be delivered live at the International Convention of the World Woman's Christian Temperance Union (WWCTU)-an organization which Ellen White
actively supported. The President, Sarah Ward, has already invited me on two
previous occasions. This year the
International WWCTU is held in Indianapolis from September 14-16, 2007, and
brings together Temperance Leaders from different parts of the world.
The
delegates are eager to obtain the live video recording of my lecture on The
Christian and Alcoholic Beverages, in order for them to share it with their congregations back home.
For the benefit of our subscribers who will not be able to attend the
convention, I posted in the last newsletter No. 179, a transcript of the
lecture.
If you live in Indianapolis, you are
welcomed to attend the convention. I am scheduled to deliver my lecture The
Christian and Alcoholic Beverages on Sabbath morning, September 15, at 10:00 a. m. The convention is
held at the AdamÕs Mark Hotel, 2544 Executive Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46241.
The hotel phone number is: (317) 248-2481. For directions and further detailed information, contact
Sarah R. Ward, WWCTU President, at (765) 345-2306
In
order to make full use of the DVD disk, we video taped on the same evening also
a second powerpoint lecture entitled How to Build a Happy and Lasting
Marriage. This is one of
my favorite sermon where I share the highlights of my book The Marriage
Covenant, by presenting
10 biblical principles for building a happy and lasting marriage. I use 100
powerpoint slides to deliver this practical lecture, which has been warmly
received by congregations in different parts of the world.
At
this time you can order this DVD album, called ABUNDANT LIFE SEMINAR, at the special introductory offer of only
$50.00, instead of the regular price of $100.00. The price includes the
AIRMAILING to any foreign country.
You
can order the ABUNDANT LIFE DVD album online or
by phone. To order online simply
click at this link: http://www.biblicalperspectives.com/cart/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23&products_id=102 To order by phone, call us at (269) 471-2915.
BOOKS
FOR SALE FROM TWO PRIVATE LIBRARIES
If
you are looking for Bible
Commentaries, theological dictionaries, theological and church history books,
feel free to call me at 269-471-2915.
I will be glad to give you some detail information about two private
libraries.
The
first library belongs to my brother-in-law, Dr. Giuseppe De Meo, and the second
to myself. Both of us have decided
to sell most of books found in our respective private libraries. The reason is
simple. We are advancing in age and we do not want to burden our family members
with disposing of our large libraries. When my father passed away in Rome,
Italy, our family members did not know what to do with all his books. Moreover,
I live a mile away from Andrews University Library where I can easily find
practically any book that I need.
Dr.
De Meo has emailed me the list of the titles of his books, commentaries, church
histories, and various collections in English, French, and Italian. In my own library I do have also have
English, French, and Italian books. I do not have the time to prepare a list,
but I can mention some of the main commentaries and other books available. Feel free to call me at (269) 471-2915
if you are interested.
THE IMMORTALITY OF THE SOUL
Samuele Bacchiocchi
Retired Professor of Theology, Andrews
University
Chapter 2 of the forthcoming book
POPULAR BELIEFS: ARE THEY BIBLICAL?
Throughout
human history, people have refused to accept the finality that death brings to
life. They have tried to deny the reality of death by teaching various forms of
life after death. A key component of this teaching has been the belief in the
survival of the soul apart from the body at the moment of death.
In
spite of all the scientific breakthrough, the popularity of the belief in the
immortality of the soul has not subsided. On the contrary, it is spreading
today like wildfire. According to
a recent Gallup Poll, 71 percent of Americans believe in some form of conscious
life after death.1 The
popularity of this belief can be attributed, not only to the traditional
teachings of Catholic and Protestant churches, but also to such factors as the
polished image of mediums and psychics, the sophisticated ÒscientificÓ research
into near-death experiences, and the popular New Age channeling with the
alleged spirits of the past.
The
result is that few beliefs are more widely held today than that of the
Òimmortal soul.Ó Virtually everyone is familiar with this belief. If asked, the
average religious person would define the belief something like this: A human
being is composed of both body and
soul. The body is the temporary physical flesh-and-blood ÒshellÓ that houses
the soul. The soul is the nonmaterial, immortal component that leaves the body
at death and lives on consciously forever in heaven or hell (or purgatory for
the Catholics).
Is
this popular belief taught in the Bible? Does the Bible teach that we have an
immortal soul that leaves the body at death and heads on for heaven or hell, or
purgatory? The answer of the average religious person is ÒYESÓ! They simply
assume that the belief in the immortality of the soul is taught in the Bible.
Is this true? Absolutely NOT! This chapter shows that the notion of an immortal
soul co-existing with a mortal body, is foreign to the Bible. It derives mostly
from Greek pagan philosophies that gradually entered into the Christian church.
We
shall see that the biblical view of human nature is wholistic, not dualistic,
that is to say, body and soul are not two distinct components, but an
indissoluble unity. The soul is simply the animating principle of the body. So
prepare yourself for what could be one of the big surprises of your life!
Objectives
of this Chapter
This chapter pursues three major
objectives. First, we briefly trace the history of the belief in the
immortality of the soul, by focusing first on the impact of the Greek
philosophers Socrates (470-399 B. C.) , (Plato (427-347 B. C.) and Aristotles
(384-322 B. C.) on the development of the Christian understanding of human
nature. Second, we will mention briefly the key role played by Tertullian
(155-240), Origen ((ca. 185-254), Augustine (354-430) and Thomas Aquinas
(1225-1274) in leading the church to adopt the Platonic dualistic view of human
nature.
The
second objective is to define the biblical view of the soul. Our study of the Òsoul textsÓ found
both in the Old and New Testaments, shows that contrary to popular beliefs, the
soul is not an immaterial, immortal part of human nature that survives the body
at death, but the animating, life principle of the body. It is often used as a
synonym for the whole person.
The
third objective is to compare and contrast the biblical wholistic view of human
nature with the Platonic dualistic view that has been embraced by Catholics and
most Protestants. We shall see that the two views have far-reaching doctrinal
and practical implications, which largely determines what Christians believe
about their present life and their future destiny. These two views impact
directly or indirectly on a host of Christian beliefs and practices. The
ultimate goal of this study is to lead truth-seekers to understand and accept
the biblical view of our nature and destiny.
The
material contained in this chapter is largely excerpted from my book Immortality
or Resurrection? Interested
readers can find a fuller treatment of the subject in the book. Important
topics, like the biblical view of the human Òspirit,Ó have been left out in
this chapter, simply for the sake of brevity.
PART
I
A
HISTORICAL GLIMPSE OF THE BELIEF
IN
THE IMMORTALITY OF THE SOUL
The
serpentÕs lie, ÒYou will not dieÓ (Gen 3:4) has lived on throughout human
history to our time. The belief in some form of life after death has been held
in practically every society. The need for reassurance and certainty in the
light of the challenge that death poses to human life, has led people in every
culture to formulate beliefs in some forms of afterlife. Such beliefs, as we
shall see, reflect human attempts to achieve immortal life through human
speculations, rather than divine revelation.
EgyptiansÕ
Belief in the Immortality of the Soul
It
is difficult to pinpoint historically the origin of the belief in the
immortality of the soul, since all the ancient civilizations held to some forms
of conscious life after death. The Greek historian Herodotus, who lived in the
fifth century before Christ, tells us in his History that the ancient Egyptians were the
first to teach that the soul of man is immortal and separable from the body. At
death the soul passes through various animals before being reborn in human
form. The cycle was suppose to take three thousand years.2
Nowhere
in the ancient world was the concern for the afterlife so deeply felt as in
Egypt. The countless tombs unearthed by archaeologists along the Nile offer an
eloquent testimony to the Egyptian belief in conscious life after death. They
spent an outrageous amount of time and money preparing for life after death.
They practiced elaborate ceremonies to prepare the pharaohs for their next
life. They constructed massive pyramids and other elaborate tombs filled with
luxuries the deceased were supposed to need in the hereafter. The famous Book
of The Dead is a
collection of ancient Egyptian funerary and ritual texts, which describes in
great details how to meet the challenges of the afterlife.
Greek
Philosophers Promoted Immortality of the Soul
The
Egyptian belief in the immortality of the soul existed centuries before
Judaism, Hellenism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam. According to
Herodotus, eventually the Greeks adopted from the Egyptians the belief in the
immortality of the soul. He wrote: ÒThe Egyptians also were the first who
asserted the doctrine that the soul of man is immortal. . . . This opinion,
some among the Greeks have at different periods of time adopted as their own.Ó3
The
Greek philosopher Socrates (470-399 B. C.) traveled to Egypt to consult the
Egyptians on their teachings on the immortality of the soul. Upon his return to
Greece, he imparted this teaching to his most famous pupil, Plato (428-348 B.
C.).
In
his book, The Phaedo,
Plato recounts SocratesÕ final conversation with his friends on the last day of
his life. He was condemned to die by drinking hemlock for corrupting the youths
of Athens by teaching them Òatheism,Ó that is, the rejection of the gods. The
setting was an Athenian prison and the time the summer of 399 B. C. Socrates
spent his last day discussing the origin, nature, and destiny of the human soul
with his closest friends.
In
the dialogue Socrates repeatedly declares death to be Òthe separation of the
soul from the bodyÓ in which it is encased. His language is strikingly similar
to that of many Christian churches today.
ÒThe soul whose inseparable attribute is life, will never admit of
lifeÕs opposite, death. Thus the soul is shown to be immortal, and since
immortal, indestructible. . . . Do we believe there is such a thing as death?
To be sure. And is this anything but the separation of the soul and body? And
being dead is the attainment of this separation, when the soul exists in
herself and separate from the body, and the body is parted from the soul. That
is death. . . . Death is merely the separation of soul and body.Ó4
In Phaedo, Plato
explains that there is a judgement after death for all souls, according to the
deeds done in the body. The righteous souls go to heaven and the wicked to
hell.5
This
teaching found its way first into Hellenistic Judaism especially through the
influence of Philo Judaeus (ca. 20
B.C. A. D. 47) and later into Christianity especially through the influence of
Tertullian (ca. 155-230), Origen (ca. 185-254), Augustine (354-430), and Thomas
Aquinas (1225-1274). These writers attempted to blend the Platonic view of the
immortality of the soul with the biblical teachings on the resurrection of the
body.
Two
Groups of Jewish Writers During the Inter-Testament Period
During the inter-Testament period, that
is, the four centuries that separate the end of the Old Testament from the
beginning of the New Testament, two groups of Jewish Aprocryphal writers
appeared. The earlier writers maintained the Old Testament wholistic view of
human nature and the belief in Conditional immortality, that is, immortality not
as an innate human possession, but as the gift of eternal life given at the
resurrection. This line culminated in the Conditionalist witness of the Dead
Sea Scroll.6
A
later group of Jewish writers were influenced by the Greek belief in the
immortality of the soul, prayer for the dead, and denial of the resurrection.
These teachings are found in what are known as the Apocrypha of the Old
Testament-books that are included in the Catholic Bible, but omitted in
the Protestant Bible and in the Hebrew Old Testament. These books include 1 and
2 Esdra, 1, 2, 3, 4 Maccabees, Baruch, additions to Daniel, Judith, The Prayer
of Manasseh, Sirach, Tobit, and the Wisdom of Solomon.
The
most influential Hellenistic Jewish writer is Philo Judaeus (ca. 20 B.C. A. D.
47). He made a systematic attempt
to prove the existence of an inner harmony between Plato and Moses, that is,
between Jewish religious thought and Greek philosophy. He taught that man has
an irrational soul in common with all living creatures and a rational soul in
common with the unbodied souls in the heavens. At the death of the body, the
rational souls of the righteous return to the realm of the unbodied heavenly
beings, which are soul. By contrast the souls of the wicked will suffer endless
punishment.7 Gradually
this teaching infiltrated into the Christian Church, which was already
influenced by a modified form of Platonism, called Neo-platonism.
Early
Christian Church: Immortality is a Gift Received at the Resurrection
Christ and the apostles confirmed and
clarified the Old Testament wholistic view of human nature, by teaching that
immortality is not an innate human possession, but a gift reserved for the righteous and bestowed
at the resurrection. Unrepentant sinners will be ultimately destroyed.
This
view continued intact throughout the writings of the so-called Apostolic
Fathers (Clement of Rome, Ignatius of Antioch, the Didache, Barnabas of
Alexandria, Hermas of Rome, Polycarp of Smyrna) and in a conspicuous line of
later writers such as Justin, Irenaeus, Novatian, Arnobius, Lactantius, et
cetera.
Le
Roy Froom concludes his 100 pages survey of the writings of the Apostolic
Fathers (writers who lived closest to the Apostles) by quoting from a similar exhaustive survey done by Henry
Constable, an Anglican Irish Priest, who wrote: ÒFrom beginning to end of them
[the Apostolic Fathers] there is not a word said of that immortality of the
soul which is so prominent in the writings of later fathers. Immortality is by
them asserted to be peculiar to the redeemed. . . . Not one stray expression of
theirs can be interpreted as giving any countenance to the theory of
restoration after purgatorial suffering.Ó8 The same conclusion applies to several
later writers mentioned earlier.
Innate
Immortality Infiltrates the Church
Modified forms of the Platonic view of
the immortality of the soul were adopted by Christian writers beginning from
the latter part of the second century. The most influential promoters were
Tertullian (155-240), Origen (ca. 185-254), Augustine (354-430) and Thomas
Aquinas (1225-1274). We shall say a few words about each of them.
Tertullian:
Eternal Torment
Tertullian
is rightly regarded as the founder of Latin theology. He was born is a heathen
home in Cathage, North Africa, and received legal training in Rome. He returned to Carthage at the age of
forty and embraced the Christian faith after witnessing the courage of martyrs
and the life of holiness of Christians. His numerous apologetic, theological,
and ascetic works in Latin, have been very influential on Latin Christianity.
Tertullian was the first to formulate the
teachings of endless torment for the wicked, by applying the notion of the
immortality of the soul to the saved and unsaved. He expressly taught that Òthe torments of the lost, will be
co-eternal with the happiness of the saved.Ó9
Tertullian
rejected PlatoÕs teaching of the pre-existence of the souls, but he embraced
his teachings that Òevery soul is immortal.Ó He wrote: ÒFor some things are known even by nature: the
immortality of the soul, for instance, is held by many . . . I may use
therefore, the opinion of Plato, when he declares: ÔEvery soul is immortalÓ10 Note that the opinion of Plato is cited to support the
belief in the immortality of the soul. No attempt is made to validate such
doctrine by the authority of Scripture, obviously because, as we shall see, in
the Bible the soul does not exist apart from the body.
Origen: Universal Restoration
The influence of Platonic dualism is
evident especially in the writings
of Origen (ca. 185-254), a man who came to be acknowledged as the most
accomplished scholar of his generation. He rejected TertullianÕs teaching of
eternal torment, promoting instead the universal restoration of even the most
incorrigible sinners, including the demons and Satan himself. After a period of
corrective punishment, all of them will be brought again into ultimate
subjection to Christ.
OrigenÕs
teaching derives largely from PlatoÕs notion that the soul is an immaterial and
immortal substance. In his De
Principiis (On the
Principle), Origen repeatedly refers to the ÒsoulÓ as a ÒsubstanceÓ which
partakes of the Òeternal natureÓ and Òlasts for ever.Ó ÒEvery substance which partakes of that
eternal nature should last for ever, and be incorruptible and eternal.Ó11
Since
the soul partakes of the divine nature and cannot be destroyed, Origen reasoned
that the only way moral evil can ultimately eliminated, is for God to restore
even the incorrigibly wicked after His Òconsuming fire . . .throroughly
cleanses away the evil.Ó12
Both
TertullianÕs eternal torment and OrigenÕs cleansing fire, are unbiblical
teachings which are fatal to true Christian faith, though in opposite
ways. One threatened an eternal punishment that God never decreed and
the other promised a universal salvation that God never authorized. In Scripture evil is a reality of this
present time, not an inevitable part of eternity. By allowing their mind to be
guided by pagan philosophy rather than Scriptural teachings, brilliant men like
Tertullian and Origen developed heresies that have undermined Christian beliefs
and practices.
Augustine
Sets the Immortal Soul Teaching for the Middle Ages
Augustine (354-430), Bishop of Hippo,
North Africa, is rightly regarded as the most influential Latin Father. His
influence on theology was immense, particularly up to the thirteenth century
when Thomas Aquinas appeared.
The
influence of Augustine was so powerful that he secured the dominance for
centuries of the doctrine of the natural immortality of the soul and the
eternal torment of the wicked. Once he asked: ÒWhat simple and illiterate man
or obscured woman that does not believe the immortality of the soul and a
future life?Ó13 It is
evident that by that time this belief had become widely accepted. But the validity of a teaching is
determined not by its popularity, but by its conformity to biblical witness.
For
Augustine death meant the destruction of the body, which enables the immortal
soul to continue to live in either the beatitude of Paradise or in the eternal
torment of Hell. In The City of
God he wrote that the
soul Òis therefore called immortal, because in a sense, it does not cease to
live and to feel; while the body is called mortal because it can be forsaken of
all life, and cannot by itself live at all.Ó14
Augustine
modified the Platonic conception of the soul by teaching that a human being is
a rational soul that uses a mortal, material body, but the soul is not imprisoned in the body. Furthermore, he taught that
the soul does not pre-exist eternally, as maintained by Plato, but comes into existence when
incarnated in a body.
AugustineÕs
modified form of Platonism dominated much of medieval Christian thought in the West until the appearance
of Thomas Aquinas. During this
time the teachings of Socrates and Plato became so widely accepted that they
were frequently regarded as divinely inspired pre-Christian saints.
Thomas
Aquinas Defines the Traditional Catholic Immortal Soul Teaching
Thomas
Aquinas (1225-1274) is considered by most Roman Catholics as their greatest
theologian. His definition of Catholic teachings has been largely unsurpassed.
With regard to the nature of man, he developed a less radical dualism, by
emphasizing the unity that exists between the body and the soul.
Contrary
to the Platonic-Agustinian view in which the soul dwells in the body for a time
without forming one substantial being, Thomas Aquinas considers the soul as the
form of the body. His thinking was influenced by
Aristotles who viewed the soul primarily as a life principle. But Aquinas
departed from Aristotles by claiming independent existence for the soul.
According
to Aquinas, a substantial unity exists between the soul and the body, or more
exactly, the spiritual principle and the material principle, which are united
as ÒformÓ and ÒmatterÓ in order to form one complete being. ÒIt is clear that the soul is united to
the body by nature: because by its essence it is the form of the body.
Therefore it is contrary to the nature of the soul to be deprived of the body.Ó15
Aquinas
defended the immortality of the soul by arguing that it is a Òsubstantial formÓ
that exists independently of the body, but desires to be joined together again
to its own body at the Resurrection. He strongly opposed those who held to the
biblical view that the soul is the animating principle of the body, which is
mortal until God confers upon it the gift of immortality at the Resurrection.
AquinasÕ
definition of the immortal soul as the form of the body, has become the traditional
teaching of the Catholic Church that is still current today. In fact, AquinasÕ language is reflected
in the new Catechism of the Catholic Church, which states: ÒThe unity of the soul and
body is so profound that one has to consider the soul to be the ÔformÕ of the body. . . . The Church teaches
that every spiritual soul is created immediately by God-it is not
ÔproducedÕ by the parents-and also that it is immortal: it does not
perish when it separates from the body at death, and it will be reunited with
the body at the final Resurrection.Ó16
This
definition of the Catechism of
the Catholic Church, rightly
represents what Òthe Church teaches,Ó but not what the Bible teaches. Shortly
we shall see that the teaching of the immortal soul that separates from the
body at death, is foreign to the teachings of the Bible. It is derived, as our
survey has shown, from Greek dualistic speculations that have perverted the
teachings of the Word of God.
The
belief in the survival of the soul contributed to the development of the
doctrine of Purgatory, a place where the souls of the dead are purified by
suffering the temporal punishment of their sins before ascending to Paradise.
This widely believed doctrine burdened the living with emotional and financial
stress. As Ray Anderson puts it,
ÒNot only did one have to earn enough to live, but also to pay off the
Ôspiritual mortgageÕ for the dead as well.Ó17
ReformersÕ Rejection of Purgatory
The Protestant Reformation started
largely as a reaction against the medieval superstitious beliefs about the
afterlife in Purgatory. The
Reformers rejected as unbiblical and unreasonable the practice of buying and
selling indulgences to reduce the stay of the souls of departed relatives in
Purgatory. However, they continued
to believe in the conscious existence of souls either in Paradise or Hell.
Calvin
expressed this belief far more aggressively than Luther.18 In his treatise Psychopannychia,19 which he wrote against the
Anabaptists who taught that souls simply sleep between death and resurrection,
Calvin argues that during the intermediate state the souls of the believers
enjoy the bliss of heaven; those of the unbelievers suffer the torments of
hell. At the resurrection, the
body is reunited with the soul, thus intensifying the pleasure of paradise or
the pain of hell. Since that time, this doctrine of the intermediate state has
been accepted by most Protestant churches and is reflected in various
Confessions.20
For
example, the Westminster Confession (1646), regarded as the definitive
statement of Presbyterian beliefs in the English-speaking world, states: ÒThe body of men after death
return to dust, and see corruption; but their souls (which neither die nor
sleep) having an immortal subsistence, immediately return to God who gave
them. The souls of the righteous,
being then made perfect in holiness, are received unto the highest heavens,
where they behold the face of God in light and glory, waiting for the full
redemption of their bodies: and the souls of the wicked are cast into hell,
where they remain in torment and utter darkness, reserved to the judgment of
the great day.Ó21 The
confession continues declaring as unbiblical the belief in purgatory.
Revival
of the Belief in the Immortality of the Soul
Public
interest in the life of the soul after death has been revived in our times, not
only by the teachings of Catholic and Protestant churches, but also through
various attempts to communicate with the spirits of the dead through mediums, psychics,
ÒscientificÓ research into near-death experiences, and New Age channeling with
the spirits of the past.
In
the late 1960s, the late Episcopal bishop James A. Pike gave new and widespread
attention to the idea of communicating with the spirits of the dead by
communicating on a regular basis with his deceased son. Today our society is
flooded with mediums and psychics who advertise their services nationwide
through TV, magazines, radio, and newspapers.
In
their book At the Hour of Death, K. Osis and E. Haraldson write: ÒSpontaneous experiences of
contact with the dead are surprisingly widespread. In a national opinion poll .
. . 27 per cent of the American population said they had encounters with dead
relatives, . . . widows and widowers . . . reported encounters with their dead
spouses twice as often-51 per cent.Ó22 Communication with the spirits of the
dead is not just an American phenomenon. Surveys conducted in other countries
reveal a similar high percentage of people who engage the services of mediums
to communicate with the spirit of their deceased loved ones.23
Conclusion
The preceding survey has shown that
SatanÕs lie ÒYou shall not dieÓ (Gen 3:4) has lived on in different forms
throughout human history, especially through the belief in the immortality of
the soul and its separation from the body at death. The popularity of this
belief, stems from the fact that attempts to disarm death by giving people the
false assurance that they possess a divine element that lives on after the
death of their body. Ultimately such a belief does away with the need of ChristÕs Return to bestow the gift
of immortality to believers at the final
Resurrection.
Our
only protection against the deceptive teaching of the immortality of the soul,
is through a clear understanding of what the Bible teaches about the make-up of
human nature, especially the relationship between the body and the soul. It is
to this subject that we now turn our attention.
PART
II
THE OLD TESTAMENT VIEW
OF HUMAN NATURE
The
logical starting point for the study of the Biblical view of human nature is
the account of the creation of man. We use here the term ÒmanÓ as used in Scripture, namely, including both man and woman.
Genesis
2:7: ÒA Living SoulÓ
The most important Biblical statement for
understanding human nature is found in Genesis 2:7. It is not surprising that this text forms the basis of much
of the discussion regarding human nature, since it provides the only Biblical account
of how God created man. The text reads: ÒThen God formed man of dust from the
ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a
living soul.Ó
Historically,
this text has been read through the lenses of classical dualism. It has been
assumed that the breath of life God breathed into manÕs nostrils was simply an
immaterial, immortal soul implanted into the material body. And just as earthly
life began with the implantation of an immortal soul into a physical body, so
it ends when the soul departs from the body. Thus Genesis 2:7 has been
historically interpreted on the basis of the traditional body-soul dualism.
People
who read the Old Testament references to nephesh (which in the King James version are
translated 472 times as ÒsoulÓ) with a dualistic mind-set, will have great
difficulty in understanding the Biblical view of the body and the soul as being
the same person seen from different perspectives. They will experience problems
with accepting the Biblical meaning of the ÒsoulÓ as the animating principle of both human and animal life. Furthermore, they will be at a loss to
explain those passages that speak of a dead person as a dead soul-nephesh (Lev 19:28; 21:1, 11; 22:4; Num 5:2;
6:6,11; 9:6, 7, 10; 19:11, 13; Hag
2:13). For them it is inconceivable that an immortal soul could die with
the body.
The
Meaning of ÒLiving SoulÓ
The prevailing assumption that the human
soul is immortal has led many to
interpret the phrase Òman became a living soulÓ (Gen 2:7 KJV) to mean that Òman obtained a living soul.Ó This interpretation has been challenged
by numerous scholars who are aware of the difference between the
Greek-dualistic and the Biblical-wholistic conception of human nature.
For
example, in his classic study Anthropology of the Old Testament, Hans Walter Wolff comments on Genesis 2:7 saying: ÒWhat does nephesh
[soul] mean here? Certainly not soul [in the traditional dualistic
sense]. Nephesh [soul] was designed to be seen together
with the whole form of man, and especially with his breath; moreover man does
not have nephesh [soul],
he is nephesh [soul],
he lives as nephesh [soul].Ó24
The fact that the soul in the Bible
stands for the whole living person is recognized even by Catholic scholar Dom
Wulstan Mork. In his book The Biblical Meaning of Man, published with the official Catholic imprimatur-approval, Mork writes: ÒIt is nephesh [soul] that gives life to the bashar [body], but not as a distinct
substance. Adam doesnÕt have nephesh [soul]; he is nephesh [soul], just as he is bashar [body]. The body, far from being divided
from its animating principle, is the visible nephesh [soul].Ó25
From
a Biblical perspective, the body and the soul are not two different substances
(one mortal and the other immortal) abiding together within one human being,
but two characteristics of the same person. Johannes Pedersen admirably sums up this point by a
statement that has become proverbial: ÒThe body is the soul in its outward
form.Ó26 The same view
is expressed by H. Wheeler Robinson in an equally famous statement: ÒThe Hebrew
idea of personality is that of an animated body, not (like the Greek) that of
an incarnate soul.Ó27
Summing
up, we can say that the expression Òman became a living soul-nephesh
hayyahÓ does not mean
that at creation his body was endowed with an immortal soul, a separate entity,
distinct from the body. Rather, it means that as a result of the divine
inbreathing of the Òbreath of lifeÓ into the lifeless body, man became a
living, breathing being, no more, no less. The heart began to beat, the blood
to circulate, the brain to think, and all the vital signs of life were
activated. Simply stated, Òa living soulÓ means Òa living being.Ó
The
practical implications of this definition are brought out in a suggestive way
by Catholic Scholar Dom Wulstan Mork: ÒMan as nephesh [soul] means that it is his nephesh [soul] that goes to dinner, that tackles
a steak and eats it. When I see
another person, what I see is not merely his body, but his visible nephesh [soul], because, in the terms of Genesis
2:7, that is what man is—a living nephesh. The eyes have been called Ôthe window of
the soul.Õ This is actually dichotomy. The eyes, as long as they belong to the
living person, are in themselves the revelation of the soul.Ó28
Animals
as ÒLiving Souls
The meaning of Òliving soulÓ as simply
Òliving beingÓ is supported by the
use of the same phrase Òliving soul-nephesh hayyahÓ for animals. In our KJV Bible, this phrase appears for the first time in
Genesis 2:7 when the creation of Adam is described. But in the Hebrew Bible we find the same phrase already in
Genesis 1:20, 21, 24, and 30. In
all four of these verses Òliving soul-nephesh hayyahÓ refers to animals, but translators of
most English versions have chosen to translate it Òliving creatureÓ rather than
Òliving soul.Ó Why? Simply because
they are conditioned by the belief that animals do not have a soul-only
human beings have an immaterial, immortal soul.
Norman
Snaith finds this Òmost reprehensibleÓ and says . . . Òit is a grave reflection on the Revisers [translators of
the Authorized version] that they retained this misleading difference in
translation. . . . The Hebrew phrase should be translated exactly the same way
in both cases. To do otherwise is to mislead all those who do not read Hebrew. There
is no excuse and no proper defense.
The tendency to read Ôimmortal soulÕ into Hebrew nephesh and to translate accordingly is very
ancient, and can be seen in the Septuagint . . .Ó29
Basil Atkinson, a former Librarian at
Cambridge University, offers the same explanation. ÒOur translators [of the
Authorized Version] have concealed this fact from us, presumably because they
were so bound by current theological notions of the meaning of the word Ôsoul,Õ
that they dared not translate by it a Hebrew word that referred to animals,
although they have used it in the margin [of the Authorized Version] at verses
20 and 30. In these verses we find
Ôthe moving creature, even living soulÕ (Heb.) (ver. 20); Ôevery living soul
(Heb. nephesh) that
movethÕ (ver. 21); ÔLet the earth bring forth the living soul (Heb. nephesh) after his kindÕ (ver. 24); Ôand to
every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that
creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is living soulÕ (Heb. nephesh) (ver. 30).Ó30
The
use of nephesh—soul
in these verses to refer to all sorts of animals clearly shows that nephesh is not an immortal soul given to man, but
the animating principle of life or Òthe life-breathÓ which is present in both
man and animals. What distinguishes the human soul from that of animals is the fact that humans were
created in GodÕs image, that is, with godlike possibilities unavailable to
animals.
The important point to note at this
juncture is that both man and animal are souls, because they both share the same animating
life-principle or Òlife-breath.Ó
Summing up, in he context of creation the
word Ònephesh-soulÓ
is used to designate the animating principle of life which is present in both
human beings and animals. At this
point, we wish to explore the broader use of nephesh in the Old Testament. Since nephesh occurs in the Old Testament 754 times
and is rendered in 45 different ways,31 our focus is on three main
usages of the word that relate directly to the object of our investigation.
Soul as a
Needy Person
In his state-of-the-art book Anthropology
of the Old Testament, which
is virtually undisputed among scholars of various religious persuasions, Hans
Walter Wolff entitles the chapter on the soul as ÒNephesh-Needy Man.Ó32 The reason for this characterization of
nephesh as Òneedy
manÓ becomes evident when one
reads the many texts which picture nephesh-soul in dangerous situations of life and death proportions.
Since
it is God who made man Òa living soulÓ and who sustains the human soul, the
Hebrews when in danger appealed to God to deliver their soul, that is, their
life. David prayed: ÒDeliver my
soul [nephesh] from
the wickedÓ (Ps 17:13, KJV); ÒFor
thy righteousness sake, O Lord, bring my soul [nephesh] out of troubleÓ (Ps. 143:11, KJV). The
Lord deserves to be praised, Òfor he has delivered the soul [nephesh] of the poor from the hand of the
evildoersÓ (Jer 20:13).
People
greatly feared for their souls [nephesh] (Jos 9:24) when others were seeking their souls [nephesh] (Ex 4:19; 1 Sam 23:15). They had to flee for their souls [nephesh] (2 Kings 7:7) or defend their souls [nephesh] (Esther 8:11); if they did not, their
souls [nephesh] would
be utterly destroyed (Jos 10:28, 30, 32, 35, 37, 39). ÒThe soul that sinneth, it shall dieÓ (Ez 18:4, 20). Rahab
asked the two Israelite spies to save her family, saying: ÒDeliver our souls [nephesh] from deathÓ (Jos 2:13). In these instances, it is evident that
the soul that was in danger and needed to be delivered was the life of the
individual.
The
soul experienced danger not only from enemies but also from lack of food. In
lamenting the state of Jerusalem, Jeremiah says: ÒAll her people sigh, they
seek bread; they have given their pleasant things for meat to relieve the soul
[nephesh]Ó (Lam 1:11).
The Israelites grumbled in the wilderness because they no longer had meat as
they had in Egypt. ÒBut now our soul [nephesh] is dried away: there is nothing at all,
besides this manna, before our eyesÓ (Num 11:6).
The
theme of danger and deliverance associated with the soul [nephesh] allows us to see that the soul in the
Old Testament was viewed, not as an immortal component of human nature, but as
the uncertain, insecure condition of life which sometimes was threatened unto
death. Those situations which involved intense danger and deliverance reminded
the Israelites that they were needy souls [nephesh], living persons whose life depended
constantly upon God for protection and deliverance.
Soul as
Seat of Emotions
Being the animating principle of human
life, the soul functioned also as the center of emotional activities. In
speaking of the Shunammite, 2 Kings 4:27 says: ÒHer soul [nephesh] is vexed within herÓ (KJV). David cried to the Lord, seeking
deliverance from his enemies, saying: ÒMy soul [nephesh] is also sore vexed. . . . Return, O
Lord, deliver my soul [nephesh]Ó (Ps 6:3-4).
While
the people were waiting for GodÕs deliverance, their soul was losing
vitality. Tory Hoff notes that
Òbecause the Psalmist often wrote from within this experience [of danger], the
Psalms include phrases such as Ôtheir soul fainted in themÕ (Ps 107:5), Ômy
soul melts for sorrowÕ (Ps 119:28), Ômy soul languishes for salvationÕ (Ps
119:81), Ômy soul longs, yea, faints for thy courtsÕ (Ps 84:2), and Ôtheir soul
melted away in their evil plightÕ (Ps 107:26). Job asked, ÔHow long will you
torment my soulÕ (Job 19:2). It was also the soul that would wait for
deliverance. ÔFor God does my soul
wait in silenceÕ (Ps 62:1). ÔI
wait for the Lord, my soul waits and in his word I hopeÕ (Ps 130:5).
ÒSince
the Hebrew knew all deliverance came from God, his soul would Ôtake refugeÕ in
God (Ps 57:1) and Ôthirst for himÕ (Ps 42:2; 63:1). Once the danger had passed and the intense, precarious
nature of the situation was over, the soul would praise God for deliverance
received. ÔMy soul makes its boast
in the Lord, let the afflicted hear and be gladÕ (Ps 34:2). ÔThen my soul shall rejoice in the
Lord, exulting in his deliveranceÕ (Ps 35:9).ÕÓ33
Wolff
rightly observes that the emotional content of the soul is equated with the
self or the person and is not an
independent entity. He cites, as
an example, Psalms 42:5, 11, and 43:5 in which the same song of lament and of
self-exhortation is found: ÒWhy are you cast down, O my soul, and why are you
disquieted within me? Hope in God, for I shall again praise him.Ó ÒHere,Ó Wolff writes, Ònephesh [soul] is the self of the needy life,
thirsting with desire.Ó34
There is nothing in these passages to suggest that the soul is an
immaterial part of human nature that is equipped with personality and
consciousness and is able to survive death. We shall note that the soul dies when the body dies.
The Soul
as the Seat of Personality
The soul [nephesh] is seen in the Old Testament not only as
the seat of emotions but also as the seat of personality. The soul is the
person as a responsible individual. In Micah 6:7 we read: ÒShall I give my
first-born for my transgression, and the fruit of my body for the sin of my
soul [nephesh]?Ó The
contrast here is not between body and soul. In commenting on this
text, Catholic scholar Dom Wulstan Mork writes: ÒThe meaning is not that the soul is the human cause
of sin, with the body as the soulÕs instrument. Rather, the nephesh, the whole living person, is the cause of sin. Therefore,
in this verse, responsibility for sin is attributed to the nephesh as the person.Ó35
We
find the same idea in several texts that discuss sin and guilt. ÒIf a soul [nephesh] shall sin through ignorance . . .Ó(Lev
4:2, KJV); ÒAnd if a soul [nephesh] sins . . . he shall bear his iniquityÓ
(Lev 5:1, KJV); ÒBut the soul [nephesh] that doeth ought presumptuously . . .
that soul [nephesh] shall be cut off from among his peopleÓ
(Num 15:30, KJV). ÒBehold all
souls [nephesh] are mine; . . . the soul [nephesh] that sinneth, it shall dieÓ (Ez
18:4). It is evident that in texts
such as these, the soul is the responsible person who thinks, wills, and sins,
and consequently subjects to the death punishment.
Any
physical or psychical activity was performed by the soul because such activity
presumed a living, thinking, and acting person. In the Old Testament there is no division of activity
between the soul and the body because are two manifestations of the same
person. The soul includes and presumes the body. ÒIn fact,Ó writes Mork, Òthe
ancient Hebrews could not conceive of one without the other. There is no Greek
dichotomy of soul and body, of two opposing substances, but a unity, man, who
is bashar [body] from
one aspect and nephesh
[soul] from another. Bashar, then, is the concrete reality of human existence, nephesh is the personality of human existence.Ó36
The Soul
and Death
The survival of the soul in the Old
Testament is linked to the survival of the body, since the body is an outward
manifestation of the soul. This explains why the death of a person is often
described as the death of the soul. ÒWhen death occurs,Ó writes Johannes
Pedersen, Òthen it is the soul that is deprived of life. Death cannot strike the body or any
other parts of the soul without striking the entirety of the soul. Therefore it is also said to Ôkill a
soulÕ or Ôsmite a soulÕ (Num 31:19; 35:15,30; Jos 20:3, 9); it may also be
called to Ôsmite one as regards the soul,Õ i. e. to smite one so that the soul
is killed (Gen 37:21; Deut 19:6, 11; Jer 40:14, 15). There can be no doubt that
it is the soul which dies, and all theories attempting to deny this fact are
false. It is deliberately said both that the soul dies (Judg 16:30; Num 23:10
et al.), that it is destroyed or
consumed (Ez 22:25, 27), and that it is extinguished (Job 11:20).Ó37
Readers
of the English Bible may question the validity of PedersenÕs statement that the
soul dies, because the word ÒsoulÓ does not occur in the texts which he cites.
For example, speaking of the cities of refuge, Numbers 35:15 says: ÒAnyone who
kills any person [nephesh] without intent may flee there.Ó Since the word Òsoul-nepheshÓ does not occur in most English
translations, some may argue that the text is speaking of the killing of the
body and not of the soul. The
truth of the matter is that nephesh is found in the Hebrew text, but translators usually chose to
render it with Òperson,Ó presumably because of their belief that the soul is
immortal and cannot be killed. Their unbiblical assumption is discredited by
those texts which even in the English version clearly speak of the death of the
soul. For example, Ezekiel 18:20 reads: ÒThe soul that sins shall dieÓ (See
also Ex 18:4).
The
fate of the soul is linked to the fate of the body. As Joshua conquered the various cities beyond the Jordan, we
are told repeatedly Òhe utterly
destroyed every soul [nephesh]Ó (Jos 10:28, 30, 31, 34, 36, 38). The destruction of the body is seen as the destruction of
the soul. ÒIn the Bible,Ó writes Edmund Jacob, Ònephesh [soul] refers only to the corpse prior
to its final dissolution and while it has distinguishable features.Ó38 When the body is destroyed and
consumed so that its features are no longer recognizable, then the soul no longer
exits, because Òthe body is the soul in its outward form.Ó39 On the other hand, when the body is
laid to rest in the grave with the fathers, the soul is also at rest and lies
undisturbed (Gen 15:15; 25:8; Jud 8:32; 1 Chron 29:28).
Conclusion
The various usages of Ònephesh-soulÓ in the Old Testament never
convey the idea of an immaterial, immortal entity capable of existing apart
from the body. On the contrary, we have found that the soul-nephesh is the animating principle of life, the
life-breath, which is present in both human beings and animals. At death, the soul ceases to function
as the animating life-principle of the body, because fate of the soul is
connected inextricably with the fate of the body because the body is the
outward manifestation of the soul.
PART
III
THE
NEW TESTAMENT VIEW
OF
HUMAN NATURE
The
New Testament shows a definite continuity with the Old Testament wholistic view
of human nature. The notion of the immortality of the soul, though popularly
believed at that time, is completely absent from the writings of the New
Testament because its writers were faithful to the teachings of the Old
Testament.
The
New Testament reveals not only continuity with the Old Testament in the
understanding of human nature and destiny, but also an expanded understanding
in the light of the incarnation and teachings of Christ. After all, Christ is
the real head of the human race, since Adam Òwas a type of the one who was to
comeÓ (Rom 5:14). While in the Old
Testament human nature is related
primarily to Adam by virtue of creation and the Fall, in the New Testament
human nature is related to Christ by virtue of His incarnation and
redemption. Christ is the fullness
of revelation about human nature, meaning, and destiny.
The Greek word psyche-soul is used in the New Testament in
accordance with the basic meanings of the Hebrew nephesh-soul that we found in the Old
Testament. We briefly review the basic meaning of pyche-soul, giving special attention to the
expanded meaning of the word in the light of ChristÕs teachings and redemptive
ministry.
ÒSoulÓ as
Person
The word Òsoul-psycheÓ in the New
Testament denotes the whole person in the same sense as nephesh in the Old Testament. For example, in
his defense before the Sanhedrin, Stephen mentions that Òseventy-five
souls-[psyche]Ó
of JacobÕs family went down to
Egypt, a figure and usage found in the Old Testament (Gen 46:26-27; Ex 1:5; Deut 10:22). On the day of Pentecost, Òthree
thousand souls-[psyche]Ó (Acts 2:41) were baptized and Òfear came upon every
soul-[psyche]Ó
(Acts 2:43). Speaking of NoahÕs family, Peter says that Òeight souls-[psyche] were saved by waterÓ (1 Pet 3:20). It
is evident that in texts such as these the Òsoul-psycheÓ is used as a synonym for person.
Within
this context, we mention ChristÕs
famous promise of rest to the Òsouls-[psyche]Ó of those who accept His yoke (Matt
11:28). The expression Òrest for your souls-[psyche]Ó comes from Jeremiah 6:16, where rest
for the soul is promised to people who walk according to GodÕs
commandments. The rest which
Christ gives to the soul is not achieved, as in Platonic dualism, when the soul
is liberated from the body, but when a believer accepts His gracious provision
of salvation (ÒCome to meÓ) and live in accordance to the principles of life He taught and
exemplified (Òlearn of meÓ).
ÒSoulÓ as
Life
The most frequent meaning of the word
soul-psyche in
the New Testament is Òlife.Ó
According to one reckoning, 46 times psyche is translated Òlife.Ó40 In these instances, ÒlifeÓ provides a
fitting translation of the Greek psyche because it is used in reference to physical life. To
facilitate the identification of the word soul-psyche found in the Greek text, psyche will be translated literally as ÒsoulÓ
in places where the RSV renders it as Òlife.Ó
At
the height of the storm, Paul reassured the members of the ship that Òthere
will be no loss of souls [psyche] among you, but only of the shipÓ (Acts 27:22; cf. 27:10). In
this context, the Greek psyche is correctly translated ÒlifeÓ because Paul is talking about the
loss of lives. An angel told
Joseph: ÒRise, take the child and his mother, and go to the land of Israel, for
those who sought the childÕs soul [psyche] are deadÓ (Matt 2:20). This is one of the many references to the seeking, killing,
and saving of the soul-psyche, all of which suggest that the soul is not an immortal part
of human nature, but the physical life itself which can be in danger. In
accordance with the Old Testament, the soul-psyche is put to death when the body dies.
Jesus
associated the soul with food and drink. He said: ÒDo not be anxious about your
soul [psyche], what
you shall eat or what you shall drink, nor about your body, what you shall put
on. Is not the soul [psyche] more than food and the body more than clothing?Ó (Matt 6:25).
Here the soul-psyche is associated with food and drink and the body (the visible
exterior) with clothing.
By
associating the soul with food and drink, Jesus shows that the soul is the
physical aspect of life, though He explains that there is more to life than
food and drink. Believers can raise their desires and thoughts to heavenly
things and live for Christ and eternity. Thus, Christ expanded the meaning of
the ÒsoulÓ by including the higher life or eternal life He came to offer mankind. The fact remains, however,
that by associating the soul with food and drink, Christ shows that the soul is
the physical aspect of our
existence and not an immaterial component of our nature.
Saving
the Soul by Losing It
In the Old Testament, we found that the
soul-nephesh is
used frequently to denote the uncertainty of life, constantly facing the
possibility of harm or even destruction. Consequently, the ancient Israelites
were concerned about saving their soul, delivering their soul, restoring their
soul to safety, and sustaining their soul through provisions, especially
food. In this context, it must
have been perplexing for the Jews to hear Christ saying: ÒWhoever would save
his soul [psyche]
will lose it; and whoever loses his soul [psyche] for my sake and the gospelÕs will save
itÓ (Mark 8:35; cf. Matt 16:25; 10:39; Luke 9:24; 17:33; John 12:25).
The
impact of ChristÕs statement upon the Jews must have been dramatic, because He had the audacity to proclaim
that their souls could be saved only by losing them for His sake. The notion of
saving the soul through losing it was unknown to the Jews because it is not
found in the Old Testament. Christ
demonstrated His teaching by acting in a way that culminated in His own
crucifixion.
He
came Òto give his soul [psyche] as a ransom for manyÓ (Matt 20:28). As the Good Shepherd, He Òlaid down his soul [psyche] for the sheepÓ (John 10:11). By teaching that in order to save oneÕs
soul, it is necessary for one to lose it, to give it up, and to lay it down,
Christ expanded the Old Testament meaning of nephesh-soul as physical life by making it
inclusive of the eternal life received by those willing to sacrifice their present life (soul) for His sake.
The
Apostolic Church grasped this expanded
meaning of the soul as denoting a life of total commitment to the Savior. Judas and Silas became men who Òrisked
their soul [psyche]
for the sake of our Lord Jesus ChristÓ (Acts 15:26). Epaphroditus risked Òhis
soul [psyche]Ó for
the work of Christ (Phil 2:30).
The Apostle Paul himself testified: ÒI do not account my soul [psyche] of any value nor as precious to myself,
if only I may accomplish my course and the ministry which I received from the
Lord Jesus, to testify to the gospel of the grace of GodÓ (Acts 20: 24).
If
Paul believed that the soul is immortal,
it is unlikely that he would have viewed it of no value and worth
loosing for the sake of the gospel.
These texts show that the Apostolic Church lived out the new expanded
meaning of the soul by living a life of total, sacrificial commitment to
Christ. Believers understood
that their soul as physical life
could be saved only by consecrating it to the service of Christ.
The
most foolish mistake anyone can make is Òto gain the whole world and forfeit
his soul [psyche]Ó
(Mark 8:36). It is this soul-psyche, the life that transcends death, that is the primary object
of redemption (Heb 10:39; 13:17; James 1:21; 1 Pet 1:9, 22). While the term
ÒsoulÓ is used considerably less frequently in the New Testament than in the
Old Testament, these key passages indicate a significant expansion of its
meaning. The term came to include the gift of eternal life received by those
who are willing to sacrifice their present life for ChristÕs sake.
The Death
of the Soul Is Eternal Death
This expanded meaning of the term
soul-psyche
helps us understand a well-known,
but much misunderstood saying of Christ:
ÒDo not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul [psyche]; rather fear him who can destroy both
the soul [psyche] and
the body in hellÓ (Matt 10:28; cf. Luke 12:4). Dualists find in this text support for the concept that the soul is an immaterial
substance that is kept safe and survives the death of the body.
This
interpretation reflects the Greek dualistic understanding of human nature and
not the Biblical wholistic view.
The reference to GodÕs power to destroy the soul [psyche] and the body in hell, negates the
notion of an immaterial, immortal soul. How can the soul be immortal if God destroys
it with the body in the case of impenitent sinners? Oscar Cullmann rightly notes that Òwe hear in JesusÕ saying
in Matthew 10:28 that the soul can
be killed. The soul is not
immortal.Ó41
In
the preceding discussion, we have seen that Christ expanded the meaning of the
soul-psyche to
denote not only physical life but also eternal life received by those who are
willing to make a sacrificial commitment to Him. If this text is
read in the light of the expanded meaning given by Christ to the soul, the
meaning of the saying is: ÒDo not fear those who can bring your earthly
existence (body-soma) to an end, but cannot annihilate your eternal life in God; but
fear God who is able to destroy your whole being eternally.Ó ChristÕs warning hardly teaches the
immortality of the soul. Rather it teaches that God can destroy the soul as
well as the body.
Paul and
the Soul
In comparison with the Old Testament, or
even the Gospels, the use of the term soul-psyche in PaulÕs writings is rare. He uses the term only 13 times42
(including quotations from the Old Testament) to refer to physical life (Rom
11:3; Phil 2:30; 1 Thes 2:8), a person (Rom 2:9; 13:1), and the seat of
emotional life (Phil 1:27; Col 3:23; Eph 6:6). It is noteworthy that Paul never
uses psyche-soul
to denote the life that survives death. The reason could be PaulÕs fear that
the term psyche-soul
might be understood by his Gentile converts according to the Greek view of
innate immortality.
To
ensure that the new life in Christ would be viewed wholly as a divine gift and
not as an innate possession, Paul uses the term pneuma-spirit, instead of psyche-soul. The Apostle certainly acknowledges
a continuity between the present life and the resurrection life, but since he
sees it as GodÕs gift and not something found in human nature, he uses pneuma-spirit instead.43
In
his famous passage on the resurrection in 1 Corinthians 15, Paul shows that he
uses soul-psyche
in accordance with the Old Testament meaning of physical life. He explains the difference between the
present body and the resurrection body, saying: ÒIt is sown a physical [psychikon] body, it is raised a spiritual [pneumatikon] bodyÓ (1 Cor 15:44). The present body is psychikon, literally ÒsoulishÓ from psyche-soul, denoting a physical organism subject to
the law of sin and death. The future, resurrected body is pneumatikon, literally ÒspiritualÓ from pneuma-spirit, meaning an organism controlled by GodÕs
Spirit.
The
resurrected body is called Òspiritual,Ó not because it is nonphysical but
because it is ruled by the Holy Spirit, instead of carnal impulses. This becomes evident when we note that
Paul applies the same distinction between the natural-psychikos and the spiritual-psychikos to the present life in 1 Corinthians
2:14-15. Here Paul distinguishes between the natural man-psychikos, who is not guided by GodÕs Spirit, and
the spiritual man [psychikos], who is guided by GodÕs Spirit.
No
Natural Immortality
It is evident that for Paul the
continuity between the present and the future body is to be found not in the
expanded meaning of the soul that we have found in the Gospels, but in the role
of the Spirit of God that renews us in newness of life both now and at the
resurrection. By focusing on the role of the Spirit, Paul negates the
immortality of the soul. For him it is very important to clarify that the new
life of the believer both in the present and the future is wholly a gift of
GodÕs Spirit. There is nothing inherently immortal in human nature.
The
expression Òimmortality of the soulÓ does not occur in Scripture. The Greek word commonly translated Òimmortality Ò in our English versions
of the Bible is athanasia. This term occurs only twice in the New Testament, the first time
in connection with God Òwho alone has immortality [athanasia] and dwells in unapproachable light,
whom no man has ever seen or can seeÓ (1Tim 6:16). Obviously, immortality here
means more than endless existence. It means that God is the source of life
(John 5:26) and all other beings receive eternal life from Him.
The
second time, the word Òimmortality-athanasiaÓ occurs in 1 Corinthians 15:53-54 in
relation to mortal nature, which puts on immortality at the resurrection: ÒFor
this perishable nature must put on the imperishable, and this mortal must put
on immortality [athanasia]. When the
perishable puts on the imperishable, and the mortal puts on immortality [athanasia], then shall come to pass the saying
that is written: ÔDeath is swallowed up in victory.ÕÓ
The
Christian Hope is based not on the immortality of the soul but on the
resurrection of the body. If we want to use the word ÒimmortalityÓ with
reference to human nature, let us speak not of the immortality of the soul, but
rather of the immortality of the body (whole person) by means of the Resurrection. It is the resurrection that bestows the
gift of immortality on the body, that is, on the whole person of the believer.
Conclusion
Our survey of the New Testament use of
the term Òsoul-psycheÓ indicates that there is no support for the notion of the soul as
an immaterial and immortal entity that survives the death of the body. There is nothing in the word psyche-soul that even remotely implies a
conscious entity able to survive the death of the body. Not only does the New Testament fail to
endorse the notion of the immortality of the soul, but it also clearly shows
that the soul-psyche denotes the physical, emotional, and spiritual life. The soul is
the person as a living being, with its personality, appetites, emotions, and
thinking abilities. The soul describes the whole person as alive and thus
inseparable from the body.
Christ
expanded the meaning of soul-psyche to include the gift of eternal life received by those who
are willing to sacrifice their earthly life for Him, but He never suggested
that the soul is an immaterial, immortal entity. On the contrary, Jesus taught
that God can destroy the soul as well as the body (Matt 10:28) of impenitent
sinners.
Paul
never uses the term Òsoul-psyche to denote the life that survives death. On the contrary, he
identifies the soul with our physical organism (psychikon) which is subject to the law of sin and
death (1 Cor 15:44). To ensure that his Gentile converts understood that there
is nothing inherently immortal in human nature, Paul uses the term
Òspirit-pneumaÓ
to describe the new life in Christ which the believer receives wholly as a gift
of GodÕs Spirit both now and at the resurrection.
Summing
up our survey of the Old and New Testament view of human nature, we can say
that the Bible is consistent in teaching that human nature is an indissoluble
unity, where the body, soul, and spirit represent different aspects of the same
person, and not different substances or entities functioning independently.
This wholistic view of human nature removes the basis for the belief in the
survival of the soul at the death of the body.
PART
IV
THE
IMPLICATIONS OF THE DUALISTIC VERSUS THE WHOLISTIC VIEW OF HUMAN NATURE
Someone
may ask: What difference does it
make whether a person holds to a dualistic or wholistic view of human
nature? Is not this a pure
academic question? These are questions we wish to briefly address in the last
part of this chapter. We shall see that what Christians believe about the make-up
of their human nature largely determines what they believe about their present
life and ultimate destiny.
Implications
of the Dualistic View
of
Human Nature
We
noted earlier that historically popular Christian thought has been deeply influenced by the dualistic
teachings of Sacrates and Plato, which were promoted in modified forms by
Tertullian, Origen, Augustin, and Thomas Aquinas. The far-reaching implications
of the dualitic view of human nature for Christian beliefs and practices is
inestimable. Only a brief mention can be made in this chapter.
Doctrinal
Implications of the Dualistic View of Human Nature
Doctrinally, a host of beliefs derive
from or are dependent upon the dualistic view of human nature. For example, the belief in the
transition of the soul at the moment of death to paradise, hell, or purgatory
rests on the belief that the soul is immortal by nature and survives the body
at death. This means that, if the inherent immortality of the soul is an
unbiblical concept, then popular beliefs about paradise, purgatory, and hell
have to be radically modified or even rejected.
The
belief that at death the souls of the saints ascend to the beatitude of
Paradise has fostered the Catholic and Orthodox belief in the intercessory role
of Mary and of the saints. If the souls of the saints are in heaven, it is
feasible to assume that they can intercede on behalf of needy sinners on this
earth. Thus, devout Christians pray to Mary and the saints to intercede on their behalf. Such a practice runs contrary to the Biblical teaching that
Òthere is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ JesusÓ (1Tim 2:5).
If
the conclusion of our study is correct that the soul does not survive and
cannot function apart from the body, then the whole teaching of the
intercessory role of Mary and the saints must be rejected as an ecclesiastical
fabrication. Truly, the acceptance of the Biblical wholistic view of human
nature can have frightening consequences for long-cherished Christian beliefs.
Similarly,
the belief that at death the souls of those who are pardonable transit to
purgatory, has led to the teaching that the church on earth has the power to
apply the merits of Christ and of the saints to souls suffering in
purgatory. Historically, this has
been accomplished by granting indulgences, that is, the remission of the
temporal punishment due to forgiven sin.
Such a belief led to the scandalous sale of indulgences which sparked
the Protestant Reformation.
The
Reformers eliminated the doctrine of purgatory as unbiblical, but they retained
the doctrine of the immediate transit after death of individual souls to a
state of perfect blessedness (heaven) or to a state of continuous punishment (hell). We have found the latter teaching to
be clearly negated by Scripture. Consequently, it is imperative to continue to
the work of the Reformers, by rejecting as ecclesiastical fabrications the
popular beliefs about purgatory, indulgences, and the transit of the souls to
heaven or to hell.
Immortality
of the Soul Weakens Second Advent
Traditional dualism also has contributed
to weakening the Advent Hope. The belief in the ascension of souls to
heaven obscures and eclipses the
expectation of the Second Advent.
If at death the soul of the believer goes up immediately to the beatitude of Paradise to be with the
Lord, there can hardly be any real sense of expectation for Christ to come
down to resurrect the sleeping saints. The primary concern of these Christians
is to reach paradise immediately, albeit as a disembodied soul. This concern leaves barely any interest
in the coming of the Lord and the resurrection of the body.
To
believe in the immortality of the soul means to regards oneself at least partly
immortal in the sense of being incapable of passing out of existence. Such a
belief encourages confidence in oneself and in the possibility of oneÕs soul
going up to the Lord. On the other
hand, to believe in the resurrection of the body means to believes in Christ
who will return to raise the dead and transform the living. This means believing in the coming down of the Lord to this earth to meet
embodied believers, and not in the going up of disembodied souls to heaven to meet
the Lord.
In
the New Testament the Parousia guarantees a final consummation realized by a
movement of ChristÕs coming down to mankind rather than individual souls going up to Him. The Advent Hope is not Òa pie in the sky when you dieÓ but a
real meeting upon this earth between embodied believers and Christ on the
glorious day of His return. Out of
that real meeting will come a transformation affecting humanity and
nature. This great expectation is
obscured and erased by the belief in individual immortality and heavenly bliss
immediately after death.
Another
significant implication of the individualistic hope for immediate immortality
is that it overrides the Biblical corporate hope for an ultimate restoration of
this creation and its creatures (Rom 8:19-23; 1 Cor 15:24-28). When the only future that really counts
is the individual soulÕs survival after death, the anguish of mankind can have
only a peripheral interest and the value of GodÕs redemption for this whole
world is largely ignored. The ultimate result of this belief is, as noted by
Abraham Kuyper, that Òby far the majority of Christians do not think much
beyond their own death.Ó43
Misconceptions
About the World to Come
The belief in the immortal and spiritual
soul has fostered also wrong ideas
about the world to come. The popular concept of paradise as a spiritual retreat
center somewhere up in space, where glorified souls will spend eternity in
everlasting contemplation and meditation, has been inspired more by Platonic
dualism than by Biblical realism. For Plato, the material components of this
world were evil and, consequently, not worthy of survival. The aim was to reach the spiritual
realm where souls liberated from the prison-house of a material body enjoy
eternal bliss.
Our
study shows that both the Old and New Testaments reject the dualism between the
material world below and the spiritual realm above. The final salvation inaugurated by the coming of the Lord is
regarded in Scripture not an escape from but a transformation of this earth. The Biblical view of the world to come is not a spiritual
heavenly retreat
inhabited by glorified souls, but this physical earthly planet populated by resurrected saints (Is
66:22; Rev 21:1).
Practical
Implications of the Dualistic View of Human Nature
At a more practical level, the dualistic
view of human nature has fostered the cultivation of the soul in detachment
from the body and the suppression of physical appetites and healthy natural
impulses. Contrary to the Biblical view of the goodness of GodÕs creation,
including the physical pleasures of the body, medieval spirituality promoted
the mortification of the flesh as a way to achieve the divine goal of holiness.
The
saints were ascetic persons who devoted themselves primarily to vita
contemplativa, detaching
themselves from the vita activa. Since the salvation
of the soul was seen as more important than the preservation of the body, the
physical needs of the body often intentionally were neglected or even
suppressed.
The
dichotomy between body and soul, the physical and the spiritual, is still
present in the thinking of many Christians today. Many still associate redemption with the human soul rather
than the human body. We describe the missionary work of the church as that of
Òsaving souls.Ó The implication
seems to be that the souls are more important than the bodies.
Conrad
Bergendoff rightly notes that ÒThe
Gospels give no basis for a theory of redemption which saves souls apart from
the bodies to which they belong.
What God has joined together, philosophers and theologians should not
put apart. But they have been
guilty of divorcing the bodies and souls of men which God made one at creation,
and their guilt is not diminished by their plea that thus salvation would be
facilitated. Until we have a
theory of redemption which meets the whole need of man we have failed to
understand the purpose of Him who became incarnate that He might be able to
save humanity.Ó44
Dualism
in Liturgy
The influence of dualism can be seen even
more often in many Christian hymns, prayers, and poems. The opening sentence of
the burial prayer found in The Book of Common Prayer of the Church of England is starkly
dualistic: ÒForasmuch as it hath
pleased Almighty God of His great mercy to take unto Himself the soul of our
dear brother here departed, we therefore commit his body to the ground.Ó45
A phrase in another prayer in
the same Office betrays a clear dualistic contempt for physical existence: ÒWith whom the souls of the faithful,
after they are delivered from the burden of the flesh, are in joy and
felicity.Ó
The Platonic notion of the release of the
soul from the prison-house of the body is clearly set forth in the lines of the
Christian poet, John Donne: ÒWhen
bodies to their grave, souls from the graves remove.Ó46 Many of our hymns are thinly
disguised dualistic poems. They speak of this earth as Òa desert drearÓ and
invite believers to look Òup above the sky.Ó ÒI want to live above the world .
. . on heavenÕs tableland.Ó
Christians
who believe the words of such hymns may be disappointed one day to discover
that their eternal home is not Òabove the world . . . on heavenÕs tableland,Ó
but down here on this earth. This
is the planet that God has created, redeemed, and ultimately will restore for
our eternal habitation.
The far-reaching doctrinal and
practical implications of the dualistic view of human nature that we have just
considered should serve to impress the reader with the importance of the
subject under consideration. This is not a mere academic question but a fundamental Biblical teaching that
impacts directly or indirectly a host of Christian beliefs and practices.
Implications
of the Biblical Wholistic
View
of Human Nature
The
Biblical wholistic view of human nature, according to which our body and soul
are an indissoluble unit, created and redeemed by God, challenges us to view
positively both the physical and spiritual aspects of life. We honor God not only with our mind but
also with our body, because our body is Òa temple of the Holy SpiritÓ (1 Cor
6:19).
Scripture
admonishes us to present our Òbodies as a living sacrificeÓ (Rom 12:1). This means that the way we treat our
bodies reflects the spiritual condition of our souls. If we pollute our bodies
with tobacco, drugs, or unhealthy
food, we cause not only the physical pollution of our bodies, but also the spiritual
pollution of our souls.
Henlee
H. Barnette notes that Òwhat people do to, for, and with others and their
environment depends largely upon what they think of God, nature, themselves,
and their destiny.Ó47 When Christians view themselves and the present world
wholistically as the object of GodÕs good creation and redemption, they will be
both convinced and compelled to act as GodÕs stewards of their bodies as well
as of the created order.
Concern
for the Whole Person
Biblical wholism challenges us to be
concerned about the whole person. In its preaching and teaching, the church
must meet not only the spiritual needs of the soul but also the physical needs
of the body. This means teaching people how to maintain emotional and physical
health. It means that church
programs should not neglect the needs of the body. Proper diet, exercise, and outdoor activities should be
encouraged as an important part of Christian living.
Accepting
the Biblical wholistic view of human nature means to opt for a wholistic approach in our evangelistic and missionary endeavors. This approach consists not only in
saving the ÒsoulsÓ of people but also in improving their living conditions by working in such
areas as health, diet, education.
The aim should be to serve
the world and not to avoid it. The
issues of social justice, war, racism, poverty, and economic imbalance should
be of concern to those who believe that God is working to restore the whole
person and the whole world.
Christian
education should promote the development of the whole person. This means that
the schoolÕs program should aim at the development of the mental, physical, and
spiritual aspects of life. A good physical-education program should be
considered as important as its academic and religious programs. Parents and teachers
should be concerned about teaching good eating habits, the proper care of the
body, and a regular program of physical exercise.
The
Biblical concept of the whole person also has implications for medicine. Medical science recently has developed
what is known as holistic medicine. Holistic health
practitioners Òemphasize the necessity for looking at the whole person,
including physical condition, nutrition, emotional make up, spiritual state,
life-style values, and environment.Ó48 At the 1975 graduating exercise of Johns Hopkins University
School of Medicine, Dr. Jerome D. Frank told the graduates: ÒAny treatment of
an illness that does not also minister to the human spirit is grossly
deficient.Ó49 Healing
and the maintenance of physical health must always involve the total person.
Cosmic
Redemption
The Biblical wholistic view of human
nature presupposes also a cosmic
view of redemption that encompasses the body and the soul, the material and the spiritual world. The
separation between body and soul or spirit has often paralleled the division
between the realm of creation and the realm of redemption. The latter has been associated to a large extent in
both Catholicism and Protestantism with the salvation of individual souls at
the expense of the physical and cosmic
dimensions of redemption. The
saints often are portrayed as pilgrims who live on earth but detached from the
world and whose souls at death immediately leave their material bodies to
ascend to an abstract place called Òheaven.Ó
Dualism
has produced an attitude of contempt toward the body and the natural world.
Such an attitude of disdain toward our planet is absent from the Psalms, where
the central theme is the praise of God for His magnificent works. In Psalm 139:14, David says: ÒI will praise thee; for I am fearfully and
wonderfully made: marvellous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth very
well.Ó Here the Psalmist praises
God for his wonderful body, a fact well known to his soul (mind). This is a
good example of wholistic thinking, where body and soul are part of GodÕs
marvellous creation.
In Psalm 92, the Psalmist urges one to praise God with
musical instruments, because, he says, ÒThou, O Lord, hast made me glad by thy
work; at the work of thy hands I sing for joy. How great are thy works, O Lord!Ó (Ps 92:4-5). The PsalmistÕs rejoicing over his
wonderful body and marvelous creation
is based upon his wholistic conception of the created world as an
integral part of the whole drama of creation and redemption.
Biblical
Realism
The Biblical wholistic view of human
nature also impacts on our view of the world to come. The Bible does
not envision the world to come as an ethereal paradise where glorified souls
will spend eternity wearing white robes, singing, plucking harps, praying,
chasing clouds, and drinking milk of ambrosia. Instead, the Bible speaks of the resurrected saints
inhabiting this planet earth,
which will be purified, transformed, and perfected at and through the coming of
the Lord (2 Pet 3:11-13; Rom 8:19-25; Rev 21:1). The Ònew heavens and a new earthÓ (Is 65:17) are not a
remote and inconsequential spiritual retreat somewhere off in space; rather,
they are the present heaven and earth renewed to their original
perfection.
Believers
enter the new earth not as disembodied souls but as resurrected bodily persons
(Rev 20:4; John 5:28-29; 1 Thess 4:14-17). Though nothing unclean shall enter the New Jerusalem, we are
told that Òthe kings of the earth shall bring their glory into it, . . . they
shall bring into it the glory and the honor of the nationsÓ (Rev 21:24,
26). These verses suggest that
everything of real value in the old heaven and earth, including the
achievements of manÕs inventive, artistic, and intellectual prowess, will find
a place in the eternal order. The
very image of Òthe cityÓ conveys the idea of activity, vitality, creativity,
and real relationships.
It
is regrettable that this fundamentally concrete, earthly view of GodÕs new
world portrayed in the Scripture has largely been lost and replaced in popular
piety with an ethereal, spiritualized concept of heaven. The latter has been influenced by
Platonic dualism rather than by Biblical realism.
Conclusion
The serpentÕs lie, ÒYou will not dieÓ
(Gen 3:4) has lived on throughout human history to our time. Our brief
historical survey traced the origin of this belief in life after death to the
ancient Egyptians. They
spent an outrageous amount of time and money preparing for life after death.
The
Greek philosophers Socrates and Philo adopted the Egyptian belief in life after
death, but redefined it in terms of an immaterial, immortal soul that leaves
the prison house of the mortal body at death. They viewed death as the
separation of the soul from the body.
This
dualistic teaching found its way into the Christian church toward the end of
the second century. It was promoted first by Tertullian, and later on by
Origen, Augustine, and Thomas Aquinas.
For them death meant the destruction of the body, which enables the
immortal soul to continue to live in either the beatitude of Paradise or in the
eternal torment of Hell.
The
belief in the survival of the soul contributed to the development of the
doctrine of Purgatory, a place where the souls of the dead are purified by
suffering the temporal punishment of their sins before ascending to Paradise.
The
Reformers rejected as unbiblical and unreasonable the practice of buying and
selling indulgences to reduce the stay of the souls of departed relatives in
Purgatory. However, they continued
to believe in the conscious existence of souls either in Paradise or Hell.
Today
the belief in conscious existence after death is spreading like wildfire, due
to such factors as the polished image of mediums and psychics, the
sophisticated ÒscientificÓ research into near-death experiences, and the
popular New Age channeling with the alleged spirits of the past. The result is that most people believe
SatanÕs lie that no matter what they do, they Òshall not dieÓ (Gen 3:4) but
become like gods by living for ever.
To
test the validity of this popular belief, we examined the Old and New
Testaments view of the Òsoul.Ó We found that the Bible is consistent in
teaching that human nature is an indissoluble unity, where the body, soul, and
spirit represent different aspects of the same person, and not different
substances or entities functioning independently. This wholistic view of human
nature removes the basis for the belief in the survival of the soul at the
death of the body.
Christ
expanded the meaning of soul-psyche to include the gift of eternal life received by those who
are willing to sacrifice their earthly life for Him, but He never suggested
that the soul is an immaterial, immortal entity. On the contrary, Jesus taught
that God can destroy the soul as well as the body (Matt 10:28) of impenitent
sinners.
We
noted that the dualistic view of human nature consisting of a mortal body and
immortal soul, has far-reaching doctrinal and practical implications. It
impacts directly or indirectly on a host of popular beliefs and practices that
run contrary to the Bible. Some of these popular unbiblical beliefs are
examined in subsequent chapters.
The
work that the Reformers began by eliminating purgatory, must now be completed
by rejecting popular beliefs that are contrary toScripture. It is unlikely that
such a monumental task can be undertaken by Protestant or Catholic churches
today, because any attempt to modify or reject traditional doctrines is
interpreted as a betrayal of their traditional faith and can cause division and
fragmentation. This is a too high price that most churches are not willing to
pay. Yet it is a price that the faithful remnant must pay in order to fulfill
her mission to call upon sincere believers every where: ÒCome out of her my
people, so that you will not share in her sinsÓ (Rev 18:8).
NOTES
TO CHAPTER 2
1. See
Table 2.1 Religious Belief, Europe, and the USA, in Tony Walter, The Eclipse
of Eternity (London,
1996), p. 32.
2. James Bonwick, Egyptian Belief and
Modern Thought, 1956
reprint, p. 80.
3. Herodotus, Euterpe, chapter 123.
4. F. J. Church, translator, PlatoÕs
Phaedo, in the Library
of Liberal Arts No. 30, pp. 7-8.
5.
Ibid., pp. 66-69.
6.
For an excellent survey, see, Le Roy Edwin Froom, The Conditionalist Faith
of Our Fathers, 1966,
vol. 1, pp. 632-755.
7.
See, Le Roy Edwin Froom, The Conditionalist Faith of Our Fathers, 1966, pp. 724-726.
8.
Ibid., p. 801.
9.
C. F. Hudson, Debt and Grace as Related to the Doctrine of a Future Life, 1857, p. 326.
10.
Tertullian, On the Resurrection, chapter 3, Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 3, p. 547; Emphasis supplied.
11.
Origen, De Principiis,
Book 4, chapter 1, sec. 36, in Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 4, p. 381.
12.
Origen, Against Celsus,
book 4, chapter 13, Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 4, p. 502.
13.
Augustine, Epistle
137, chap. 3.
14.
Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 2, 1995, p. 245.
15.
Thomas Aquinas, Summa contra Gentiles IV, 79.
16.
Catechism of the Catholic Church, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1994, p. 93.
17.
Ray S. Anderson, Theology, Death and Dying, 1986, p. 104.
18. See Hans Schwarz, ÒLutherÕs Understanding of
Heaven and Hell,Ó Interpreting LutherÕs Legacy, ed. F. W. Meuser and S. D. Schneider,
1969, pp. 83-94.
19.
The text of this work is found in CalvinÕs Tracts and Treatises of the
Reformed Faith, trans.
H. Beveridge,1958, vol. 3, pp. 413-490.
20.
See, for example, Charles Hodge, Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids, 1940), Vol. 3, pp.
713-30; W. G. T. Shedd, Dogmatic
Theology (Grand Rapids,
n.d.), Vol. 2, pp. 591-640. G. C.
Berkouwer, The Return of Christ,1972, pp. 32-64.
21.
Westminster Confession, chap. 32, as cited by John H. Leith, ed., Creeds of the Churches, 1977, p. 228.
22.
K. Osis and E. Haraldsson, At the Hour of Death,1977, p. 13.
23.
Ibid., pp. 13-14. See also W. D. Rees, ÒThe Hallucinations of Widowhood,Ó BMJ 4 (1971), pp. 37-41; G. N. M. Tyrrell, Apparitions,
1953, pp. 76-77.
24.
Hans Walter Wolff, Anthropology of the Old Testament, 1974, p. 10.
25.
Dom Wulstan Mork, The Biblical Meaning of Man, 1967, p. 34.
26.
Johannes Pedersen, Israel: Its Life and Culture, 1926, vol. 1, p. 99.
27.
H. Wheeler Robinson, The Christian Doctrine of Man, 1952, p. 27.
28.
Dom Wulstan Mork (note 25), p. 34
29. Norman Snaith, ÒJustice and Immortality,Ó Scottish
Journal of Theology 17,
3, (September 1964), pp. 312-313.
30. Basil F. C. Atkinson, Life and Immortality (London, n. d.), pp.1-2.
31. The tabulation is from Basil F. C. Atkinson
(note 30), p. 3.
32.
Hans Walter Wolff (note 24), p.
10.
33. Tory Hoff, ÒNephesh and the Fulfillment It Receives as Psyche,Ó in Toward a Biblical View of Man:
Some Readings, eds.
Arnold H. De Graaff and James H. Olthuis, 1978, p. 98.
34. Hans Walter Wolff (note 24), p. 25.
35. Dom Wulstan Mork (note 25), p. 40.
36.
Ibd. p. 41.
37.
Johannes Pedersen (note 26), p. 179.
38. Edmund Jacob, ÒNephesh,Ó Theological
Dictionary of the New Testament, ed. Gerhard Friedrich,1974, vol. 9, p. 621.
39. Johannes Pedersen (note 26), p. 171.
40. The figure is given by Basil F. C. Atkinson
(note 29), p. 14.
41. Oscar Cullmann, ÒImmortality of the Soul or
Resurrection of the Dead?Ó in Immortality and Resurrection. Death in the Western World: Two
Conflicting Currents of Thought, ed. Krister Stendahl, 1968, pp. 36-37.
42. Edward Schweizer, ÒPsyche,Ó Theological Dictionary of the New
Testament, ed., Gerhard
Friedrich, 1974, vol. 9, p. 648, note 188.
43. Cited in G. C. Berkouwer, The Return of
Christ 1972, p. 34. The same view is expressed by Russell
Foster Aldwinckle, Death in the Secular City, 1972, p. 82.
44. Conrad Bergendoff, ÒBody and Spirit in
Christian Thought,Ó The Lutheran Quarterly 6 (August 1954), pp. 188-189.
45. Cited by D. R. G. Owen, Body and Soul. A Study on the
Christian View of Man
1957, p. 28.
46.
From John DonneÕs poem, ÒThe Anniversary.Ó
47. Henlee H. Barnette, The Church and the
Ecological Crisis (New
York, 1972), p. 65.
48. Encyclopedia Americana, 1983 ed., s. v. ÒHolistic Medicine,Ó p. 294.
49. Cited by Norman Cousins, Anatomy of an
Illness, 1979, p.
133. Among the many books on
holistic medicine, the following may be noted: David Allen et al., Whole
Person Medicine,
1980; Ed Gaedwag, ed., Inner
Balance: The Power of Holistic Healing, 1979; Morton
Walker, Total Health: The Holistic Alternative to Traditional Medicine, 1979; Jack La Patra, Healing the
Coming Revolution in Holistic Medicine , New York, 1978.
ANNOUNCEMENTS OF SERVICES AND PRODUCTS
HOW
TO CONTACT THE CENTER FOR CANCER CARE
Last
February 2007, I was told that I had only a few months to live, because my
liver was infested with a three pounds cancer tumor that could not be removed
surgically. I contacted several cancer centers, and the verdict of all the
oncologists with whom I spoke, was essentially the same: You have a stage four
terminal cancer that cannot be operated.
We can only prolong your life of a few months with chemotherapy.
In a
providential way the Lord lead me to the unique Center for Cancer Care, in
Goshen, Indiana that offers clinical trials on different forms of cancer not
readily available in most cancer centers. They use a combination of chemo and
microspheres. After two treatments, over 80% of the cancer cells were shut
down. And now over 98% of the cancer activity has been eliminated. I feel like a new man with a new lease
on life.
To express
my gratitude to God for His providential healing through the Center for Cancer
Care in Goshen, Indiana, I decided to post the information on how you can
contact the Center. Over 150 Adventists have already contacted the Center. The
Vice-President is Vladimir Radivojevic, who is a gracious and caring Adventist
Christian gentleman. Feel free to
contact him by phone or email.
These are his addresses:
Vladimir
Radivojevic MS, MBA
Vice-President
The
Center for Cancer Care
200
High Park Ave.
Goshen,
IN 46526
Phone:
574.535.2970
Fax: 574.535.2535
Email:
[email protected]
Websites:
www.goshenhealth.com
or www.cancermidwest.com
If
you or someone you know has cancer, feel free to contact Vladimir. He will talk
with you personally, gather your information, and place you in contact with an
oncologist who can examine your situation and give you a second opinion free of
charge. Vladimir told me that he wants to help patients unable to come to their
Center for Cancer Care, by asking physicians to evaluating the medical records
free of charge to see if the current treatments are adequate or if one of their
clinical trials programs could be of special help.
SPECIAL
FIRST TIME OFFER OF 10 DVD/CD ALBUMS FOR ONLY $150.00, INSTEAD OF THE REGULAR
PRICE OF $950.00
This offer may sound too good to be true.
For the first time I am offering together as a package all the 10 DVD/CD
albums, containing the recordings of Prof. Jon Paulien, Prof. Graeme Bradford,
and my own. Until now I have offered all these recordings separately, costing
considerably more. To make it
possible for many to benefit from all these timely messages, I have decided to
offer them together as a package for only $150.00, instead of the regular price of $950.00.
THE
PACKAGE INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING 10 ALBUMS:
1)
Prof. Jon Paulien's newly released DVD ALBUM video seminar on Simply
Revelation.
2)
Prof. Jon Paulien's CD ALBUM with a dozen of his books, and all his articles.
3)
Prof. Graeme Bradford's DVD ALBUM with a two hours video lecture on Ellen
White. He shares the highlights of his book More than a Prophet. The album contains also Prof.
Bradford's the publications and articles.
4)
Prof. Bacchiocchi's newly recorded DVD ALBUM called ABUNDANT LIFE SEMINAR. The album contains 2 video powerpoint lectures: The
Christian and Alcoholic Beverages and How to Build a Happy and Lasting Marriage. These two lectures summarize the
highlights of BacchiocchiÕs two books Wine in the Bible and The Marriage Covenant. Two separate files with 225 powerpoint
slides are included.
5)
Prof. Bacchiocchi's DVD ALBUM containing 10 video powerpoint lectures on the
Sabbath and Second Advent. Some of
the lectures show the documents Prof. Bacchiocchi found in Vatican libraries on
the role of the papacy in changing the Sabbath to Sunday. This album contains
the popular powerpoint SABBATH/ADVENT seminars Prof. Bacchiocchi presents in
many countries.
6)
Prof. Bacchiocchi's DVD ALBUM on Cracking the Da Vinci Code. The album contains a two hours video
lecture, professionally taped with a vitual studio as a background. A separate
file with 200 powerpoint slides is included.
7)
Prof. Bacchiocchi's DVD ALBUM on The Mark and the Number of the Beast. The album contains the two hours
video lecture and a separate powerpoint file with the 200 slides used for the
lecture.
8)
Prof. Bacchiocchi's CD ALBUM with
all his books and powerpoint lectures. The album consists of two disks. The
first disk has all his 18 books and over 200 articles. The second disk has the
slides and script of 25 of Prof. Bacchiocci's popular PowerPoint presentations.
9)
Prof. Bacchiocchi's DVD ALBUM on The
Passion of Christ. The album contains the 2 hours live
interview conducted by 3ABN on Prof. Bacchiocchi's book The Passion of
Christ in Scripture and History.
10)
Prof. Bacchiocchi's MP3 AUDIO ALBUM which contains 2 disks with 22 AUDIO
lectures on vital biblical beliefs and practices. Ideal for listening in your
car while driving.
HOW
TO ORDER THE PACKAGE OF THE 10 ALBUMS
You
can see the picture of all the 10 ALBUMS and read a detailed description of them, just by clicking
at this URL address:
http://www.biblicalperspectives.com/albumoffer.htm
You
can order the complete package of 10 DVD/CD Albums for only $150.00, instead of the regular price of
$950.00, in four different ways:
(1) Online: By clicking here: http://www.biblicalperspectives.com/albumoffer.htm
(2) Phone: By calling us at (269) 471-2915 to give us your credit card
number and postal address.
(3) Email: By emailing your order to <[email protected]>. Be sure to provide your postal address, credit card number, and expiration date.
(4)
Regular Mail: By mailing
a check for $150.00 to BIBLICAL
PERSPECTIVES, 4990 Appian Way, Berrien Springs, Michigan 49103, USA. We
guarantee to process your order immediately.
NEWLY
RELEASED DVD OF PROF. JON PAULIENÕS LIVE SEMINAR ON SIMPLY REVELATION
Prof. Jon
PaulienÕs DVD album on SIMPLY REVELATION was released few weeks ago. We have been airmailing the DVD album to church leaders,
pastors, and lay Adventists in different part of the world. Several pastors
have already shown the lectures to their congregations. They wrote to me saying that viewing
the lectures was an enlightening experience for their members.
My wife and I
viewed Simply Revelation on our TV on a Sabbath afternoon. Though I had already watched
Prof. PaulienÕs lectures during the taping session, I was spellbound to hear
him again offering so many refreshing insights into the most difficult book of
the Bible. For me it is a thrilling experience listening to a scholar like
Prof. Paulien, who knows what he is talking about.
Prof. Paulien
is one of the most respected Adventist scholars. Besides serving as the
chairman of the New Testament at Andrews University Theological Seminary, he
writes and lectures extensively in many parts of the world. He is rightly
regarded as a leading Adventist authority on the book of Revelation which he
has taught at the Seminary for the past 20 years. His doctoral dissertation as
well as several of his books deal specifically with the Book of Revelation.
The constant
demand for Prof. PaulienÕs CD album with his publications and articles, led me
to discuss with him the possibility of producing a live video recording of a
mini Revelation Seminar, which he chose to call Simply Revelation. As suggested by its title, Simply Revelation aims to simply present the message of
Revelation—not to read into Revelation sensational, but senseless views.
The preparation
of this video recording took several months. The Simply Revelation seminar consists of four one-hour
live video lectures,
which have just been recorded in the studio of Andrews University. An
impressive virtual studio provides the background of the lectures. Each lecture
is delivered with about 50 powerpoint slides. I have spent long hours looking for suitable pictures to
illustrate the text of each slide in order to enhance the visual effect of each
lecture. This mini Revelation seminar will offer you and your congregation
fresh insights into the Book of Revelation. Be sure to inform your pastor about
the newly released Simply Revelation, if he is not aware of it.
You will be
pleased to know that we have placed on a separate file all the powerpoint
slides and text used for the live video presentations. Each slide has the
script of the live lecture. This
means that if you are a pastor or a lay member who want to use Prof. PaulienÕs Simply
Revelation Seminar,
you can pick and choose the powerpoint slides that you like.
The file with
the powerpoint slides is placed on Prof. PaulienÕs CD album containing all his
publications and articles. The
reason is that there was no memory left on the DVD disks. In spite of my pleas, Prof. Paulien was
so full of the subject that he used the full 60 minutes of his four lecture,
leaving no space for the slidesÕ file.
This has been a
very expensive project, both in time and money. The regular price of the DVD album is $100.00, but you can
order it now at the introductory price of only $50.00. The price includes the airmailing expenses to any overseas
destination.
If you have not
ordered before the CD Album with Prof. PaulienÕs publications, we will be glad to add it to your DVD
order for only $20.00, instead of the regular price of $60.00. This means that
you can order both the DVD album with Prof. PaulienÕs four live video
lectures on Revelation and his CD album with all his publications and the powerpoint slides of Simply
Revelation, for only
$70.00, instead of the
regular price of $160.00.
As an
additional incentive, I am offering you together with Prof. PaulienÕs DVD/CD
albums, also my own popular DVD album on The Mark and Number of the Beast, for an additional $10.00, instead of the regular price of
$100.00. This means that
you can order the DVD and CD albums by Prof, Paulien, together with my DVD
album on The Mark and Number of the Beast, for only $80.00, instead of the
regular price of $260.00.
This
research on The Mark and Number of the Beast, was commissioned
by Prof. Paulien himself. He asked me to trace historically the origin and
use of the PopeÕs title Vicarius Filii Dei and of the number 666. I spent six months conducting this investigation
which was professionally taped at the Andrews University Towers Auditorium.
I use 200 powerpoint slides to deliver this informative two hours lecture
which is warmly received by Adventist church leaders and pastors in many parts
of the world. For a detailed description of this DVD album click: http://www.biblicalperspectives.com/Beast/BeastPromo
SPECIAL
OFFER ON PAULIEN/BACCHIOCCHIÕS ALBUMS
*
ONE DVD Album of Prof. PaulienÕs four video lectures on Simply Revelation at the introductory price of $50.00,
instead of $100.00. The price includes the airmailing
expenses to any overseas destination.
*
ONE DVD Album of Simply Revelation and ONE CD Album with Prof. PaulienÕs publications for
only $70.00, instead of
the regular price of $160.00. The price includes the airmailing expenses to any overseas destination.
*
ONE DVD Album of Simply Revelation, ONE CD
Album with Prof. PaulienÕs publications, and ONE DVD Album with BacchiocchiÕs
two hours video lecture on The Mark and Number of the Beast for only $80.00, instead of the regular price of $260.00.
The price includes the airmailing expenses to any
overseas destination.
FOUR
WAYS TO ORDER
(1) Online: By clicking here: http://www.biblicalperspectives.com/revelation/
(2) Phone:
By calling us at (269) 471-2915 to give us your credit card number and
postal address.
(3) Email: By emailing your order to <[email protected]>. Be sure to provide your postal address, credit card number, and expiration date.
(4)
Regular Mail: By mailing
a check to BIBLICAL PERSPECTIVES,
4990 Appian Way, Berrien Springs, Michigan 49103, USA. We guarantee to process
your order immediately.
NEW
EDITION OF BRADFORDÕS MORE THAN A PROPHET
The
new edition Prof. Graeme BradfordÕs book More than a Prophet with an additional 20 pages, was
released few weeks ago. Many churches have ordered the book by the case of 30
copies for only $150.00, that is, $5.00 per copy, instead of the regular price
of $25.00. This book is urgently needed to restore confidence in the prophetic
ministry of Ellen White by telling the truth about her divine revelations and
her human limitations.
The
most gratifying responses have come from former Adventist. One lady wrote:
ÒAfter reading More than a Prophet, I am seriously reconsidering returning to the Adventist church.Ó
It is unfortunate that many Adventists have left the church, because they felt
that they had been deceived about Ellen White. They could not reconcile in
their mind that prophets do make mistakes. But Prof. Bradford compellingly
shows that the mistakes found in the Bible or in the writings of Ellen White,
do not negate the divine inspiration of their messages.
For
a detailed description of More than a Prophet, together with the reviews and a picture
of the book, click at this link: http://www.biblicalperspectives.com/BradfordOffer/offer.htm
To
facilitate the distribution of this timely book among your church members, we
are offering you two things:
1)
Special discount on quantity orders of the book. Only $5.00 per copy, instead of $25.00
for a case of 30 copies.
2) A
FREE ALBUM of Prof. BradfordÕs DVD with a live two hours lecture on Ellen
White. The DVD contains also a PDF file with
all of Prof. BardfordÕs books and articles. The regular price of the DVD album
is $100.00, but you will receive it FREE with an order of 2 or more copies of
More than a Prophet.
The
reason for offering a Free Album of Prof. BradfordÕs DVD live lecture on Ellen
White, is to give your members the opportunity to enjoy the highlights of the
More than a Prophet. After viewing the DVD, most members are eager to order the book.
SPECIAL
OFFER ON MORE THAN A PROPHET
ONE
COPY of More than a Prophet for $20.00
(instead of $25.00), plus $5.00 for mailing in the USA, or $10.00 for
airmailing overseas.
TWO
COPIES of More than a Prophet plus the DVD album with Prof. BradfordÕs live two hours
lecture on Ellen White, for $50.00 (instead of the regular price of $150.00). Add $10.00 for airmailing
overseas.
THIRTY
COPIES of More than a Prophet plus the DVD album with Prof. BradfordÕs live two hours
lecture on Ellen White, for only $150.00, instead of the regular price of $850.00. The price includes
the mailing in the USA. Unfortunately as of May 14, 2007, the USA Post
office no longer offers surface mail service for overseas. Everything must be
sent AIRMAIL. The
cost for airmailing a case of 30 books, is $95.00. Thus, the total cost for a
case of 30 copies AIRMAILED overseas is $245.00. The advantage is that you will
receive the case within a week.
FOUR
WAYS TO ORDER
(1)
Online: By clicking
here: http://www.biblicalperspectives.com/BradfordOffer/offer.htm
(2) Phone: By calling us at (269) 471-2915 to give
us your credit card number and postal address.
(3) Email: By emailing your order to <[email protected]>. Be sure to provide your postal address, credit card number, and expiration date.
(4)
Regular Mail: By mailing
a check to BIBLICAL PERSPECTIVES,
4990 Appian Way, Berrien Springs,
Michigan 49103, USA. We guarantee to process your order immediately.
UPCOMING
SEMINARS FOR THE MONTHS OF SEPTEMBER AND OCTOBER
Gradually I am rescheduling some of the invitations I had to cancel
because of the colon cancer surgery and liver treatments. Here is a list of the
upcoming weekend seminars for the months of September and October
AUGUST
31 - SEPTEMBER 1: DAYTONA BEACH
SDA CHURCH
Location:
401 North Williamson Blvd, Daytona Beach, FL 32114.
For
directions and information call Pastor William Barrett at (386) 258-1073.
SEPTEMBER
7-8: FRIENDS OF THE SABBATH CONFERENCE
Location:
The Lecture Hall, Knoxville Convention Center, 701 Henley Street, Knoxville, TN
37920. This Sabbath Conference is
organized by English Prof. Bruce Horne, Ph. D., a leader of the Seventh-day
Christian Assembly in Knoxville with about 120 members. Several non-SDA
sabbatarian churches and groups from neighboring states are participating at
this Sabbath Conference.
Adventists
living in the Knoxville area are encouraged to attend this Sabbath
Conference. I will be the keynote
speaker on Friday evening and Saturday. We are planning also for a panel
discussion conducted by church leaders of various sabbatarian churches. This will be a unique opportunity to
become acquainted with other sabbatarians. For directions and information call Prof. Bruce Horne at
(865) 671-4342 or (423) 914-5475.
SEPTEMBER
15: WORLDÕS WOMANÕS CHRISTIAN TEMPERANCE UNION CONFERENCE
Location:
AdamÕs Mark Hotel, 2544 Executive Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46241. The hotel
phone number is: (317) 248-2481.
This is the international WorldÕs WomanÕs Christian Temperance Union
that brings together WWCTU delegates of different denominations from all over
the world.
Ellen
White was very active in this organization and was often featured as the
keynote speaker. Our Adventist church had an active Temperance program in
the past. Today we hear little from our pulpit about Temperance, partly because
alcohol and drugs are seen more as a medical than a moral issue.
I
have been invited to deliver the keynote address on Saturday, September 15,
2007 at 10: 30 a. m. Prior to my lecture, there will be a church service from
9:00 to 10:00 a. m. My powerpoint lecture is entitled ÒThe Christian and
Alcoholic Beverages.Ó I will be sharing the highlights of my book Wine in the
Bible, dealing with the biblical imperative of total abstinence. If you live in
the Indianapolis area, I would urge you to attend the meetings, especially on Saturday.
For directions and more detail information, contact Sarah R. Ward, WWCTU
President, at (765) 345-2306
SEPTEMBER
21-22: HAWAII SAMOA-TOKELAU CHURCH
Location:
1128 Banyan Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817.
For
directions and information call Pastor Michael Asuega at (808) 261-7321 or
(808) 206 5892.
SEPTEMBER
28-29: HONOLULU CENTRAL SDA CHURCH
Location:
2313 Nuuanu Avenue, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817. This will be the Hawaii Conference
Convocation for all the churches in Oahu.
For
directions and information, call the Hawaii Conference Office at (808)
595-7591.
OCTOBER
12-13: SUNNYSIDE SDA CHURCH, WA
Location: 1875 East Lincoln Avenue, Sunnyside, WA
98944.
For
directions and information call Pastor Larry Mays at (509) 840 1932 or (509)
837 4233 or (509) 837 6411
OCTOBER
19-20: ENGLAND: EAST HAM & STRATFORD
Location:
The East Ham SDA Church worships at Bryant Street Methodist Centre, Bryant
Street, Stratford, London E14 4RU.
The
Stratford SDA Church worships at 58 Janson Road (off Leytonstone Road) Stratford
London E15 1TE.
For
directions and information, call Pastor Leslie Ackie at 01279 427 558
OCTOBER
26-27: ENGLAND, LEEDS SDA CHURCH
Location:
The Leeds SDA Church is located at 169 Meanwood Road corner of Oatland Place,
Leeds LS7 1JW, Great Britain.
For
directions and information call Pastor Ian Sweeney, 0114 286 9965.
NOVEMBER
2-3: BIRMINGHAM CAMP HILL SDA CHURCH
Location: Camp Hill Sparkbrook, Birmingham, West
Midlands B12 OJP, Great Britain.
For
directions and information call Pastor Jeffeth Nicholson at 01543 360253.
INCREDIBLE
NEW OFFERS ON HITACHI PROJECTORS
HITACHI
has just released the new CP-X400 3000 lumens projector, which replaces the
CP-X444. The new projector has an
impressive high resolution, low fan noise, and a wealth of connectivity
options. The most impressive feature of this projector is the incredible price
of only $1395.00 to
help especially our churches and schools in developing countries.
This is
the special offer on the following three models:
CP-X260
HIGH RESOLUTION 2500 LUMENS - Only $1095.00
Previous SDA
price for the 2500 lumens was $2395.00.
CP-X400
HIGH RESOLUTION 3000 LUMENS - Only $1395.00
This is the
lowest price for an HITACHI 3000 lumens projector.
CP-X1250
HIGH RESOLUTION 4500 LUMENS Only $3795.00
Previous SDA
price for the 4500 lumens was $4900.00.
WARRANTY: The above prices include a 3 years 24/7
replacement warranty worth about $285.00.
You can
order the HITACHI projectors online by clicking at this link: http://www.biblicalperspectives.com/cart/catalog/index.php?cPath=24
If you
have a problem ordering online, call us at (269) 471-2915. We will take your order by phone. Your
order will be processed immediately.
THE
SMALLEST, MOST POWERFUL REMOTE PRESENTER
If you are looking for an outstanding REMOTE for your PowerPoint
presentations, you will be pleased to know HONEYWELL has just come out with the
smallest and most powerful remote in the market.
The size of the transmitter is smaller than a credit card. You can stick
it inside the palm of your hand and nobody can see it. I tested the remote in
an open environment, and the radio signal can go up to 400 feet of distance. IT
IS INCREDIBLE! The transmitter has three button: forward, backward, and laser.
You
can order online the new POWERPOINT PRESENTER simply by clicking here: http://www.biblicalperspectives.com/cart/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=27&products_id=67
If
you have a problem ordering online, simply call us at (269) 471-2915.
We will take your order by phone. You can also email us your order
at <[email protected]>,
giving us your address, credit card number, and expiration date.
DOES
YOUR CHURCH OR SCHOOL NEED A SCREEN?
If your
church/school is looking for a screen, the DA-LITE SCREEN COMPANY, the largest
manufacture of screens in the world, has agreed to offer their line of screens
to our Adventist churches and schools at about 30% discount.
The
procedure is very simple. Visit the DA-LITE SCREEN COMPANY website at http://www.da-lite.com.
You will see hundreds of models of screens with their respective prices. Once
you find the screen that you need, give us the model number by phone (269)
471-2915 or email your request <[email protected]>
We will forward your order immediately to DA-LITE that will ship the screen
directly to your address. You will receive the screen at about 30% discount.
BED
& BREAKFAST FACILITIES IN LONDON, ENGLAND
If
your travel plans call for a stop in London, you will be pleased to learn
about a most gracious Adventist couple that offer the best accommodation and
breakfast I have ever enjoyed. It has become my home away from home when in
London. See details at: http://www.biblicalperspectives.com/Promotions/BED&BREAKFAST.htm
TAGNET
SPECIAL NEW WEB HOSTING OFFER FOR ADVENTIST CHURCHES AND MEMBERS
TAGnet
provides an incredible number of webhosting services to our churches and members.
This newsletter comes to you through their gracious and efficient service.
For detail information, visit their website at http://www.netadventist.org
or http://home.tagnet.org/
You may also call their office 800 - 9TAGNET. They are ready and eager to
help you.